Package Details: java17-openjfx-bin 17-3

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/java17-openjfx-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: java17-openjfx-bin
Description: Java OpenJFX 17.0.9 client application platform (Gluon build).
Upstream URL: https://openjfx.io/
Licenses: GPL2-only
Conflicts: java17-openjfx
Provides: java-openjfx, java17-openjfx
Submitter: None
Maintainer: mh4ckwascut
Last Packager: mh4ckwascut
Votes: 3
Popularity: 0.45
First Submitted: 2023-12-07 15:50 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-05-29 21:26 (UTC)

Dependencies (6)

Required by (72)

Sources (3)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

pschichtel commented on 2024-05-31 10:27 (UTC)

@mh4ckwascut I just noticed that this package is significantly different than the java17-openjfx package when it comes to its file tree. This package puts the binaries into /usr/lib/jvm/java-17*-openjfx while the other package puts them into /usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk. I think the packages should be aligned in that regard.

mh4ckwascut commented on 2024-05-24 07:09 (UTC)

@detian My mistake, I replaced the old provide instead of adding a new one thinking it was not useful. I added it back.

detian commented on 2024-05-24 04:00 (UTC) (edited on 2024-05-24 04:02 (UTC) by detian)

@mh4ckwascut why is this package stopping to provide java-openjfx=17 anymore? When other package that require openjfx greater than 17, but not only 17, provides=(java-openjfx=17) is useful.
For example: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=hmcl-new#n17

mh4ckwascut commented on 2024-05-19 18:28 (UTC)

The package was abandoned, I adopted it and made the necessary changes. Feel free to post here if you still have problems.

dreieck commented on 2024-05-18 09:24 (UTC)

You need to depend on a 17-version of Java Runtime (java-runtime=17 or java-environment=17).

Regards and thanks for maintaining!

kyngs commented on 2024-04-28 11:37 (UTC)

I'm also having the same issue as @mh4ckwascut and @thrimbor, please fix the PKGBUILD. This should provide java17-openjfx, not java-openjfx.

thrimbor commented on 2024-04-23 15:25 (UTC)

No, it does need changing, because what it provides is java17-openjfx, not java-openjfx, and listing it incorrectly causes it to not get picked up by dependency resolution. You even listed it correctly in the conflicts-list. You only have this incorrect because you copied java-openjfx-bin without properly adjusting it, none of the other openjfx packages have this issue. Just change line 12 to the following and it'll start working properly: provides=("java17-openjfx=${pkgver}")

This has nothing to do with the JVM version the user selected.

<deleted-account> commented on 2024-03-08 06:25 (UTC)

@mh4ckwascut, It is not necessary to change it.

If it observes the wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/java#OpenJFX and compares this package with the no binary, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/java17-openjfx/, in Arch does not indicate the version in the field provides of the PKGBUILD because it is afterwards the user the one who chooses the version of his surroundings java with the command: archlinux-java

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Java#Switching_between_JVM

By this same reason neither does in the versions 8 and 11 of java-openjfx, easy thing to check exploring in AUR said packages.

mh4ckwascut commented on 2024-03-07 22:26 (UTC)

This package should provides java17-openjfx, can you fix it ?

Basher52 commented on 2023-12-31 20:14 (UTC)

Who needs wasted time for compiling. Thanks for this mate :D

1 2 Next › Last »