Package Details: apple-fonts 6-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/apple-fonts.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: apple-fonts
Description: Fonts for Apple platforms, including San Francisco and New York typefaces
Upstream URL: https://developer.apple.com/fonts/
Licenses: custom
Provides: ttf-font
Submitter: ilbuonmarcio
Maintainer: ilbuonmarcio (Bubbu0129)
Last Packager: Bubbu0129
Votes: 34
Popularity: 3.80
First Submitted: 2021-03-13 19:14 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-06-15 09:25 (UTC)

Dependencies (1)

Required by (251)

Sources (8)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last »

Bubbu0129 commented on 2024-02-28 12:47 (UTC)

Well, IMO the "apple-fonts" name is good enough. It's pretty informative while being succinct. "otf-san-francisco-new-york" seems kinda verbose. All in all, the fonts contained are indeed the ones listed under Apple's fonts page. Ultimately, whether the naming should change is down to the main maintainer @ilbuonmarcio.

As of the conflicts=(), maybe subsets of the package should be listed in provides=()? The packages install the fonts in a separate directory (/usr/share/fonts/apple-fonts/), so no conflicts should be inflicted.

aliu commented on 2024-02-27 16:46 (UTC)

Maybe! How about your PKGBUILD under mine's name with my conflicts also included in the provides?

Bubbu0129 commented on 2024-02-27 14:13 (UTC)

@aliu My bad... Anyway, thanks for the correction! As this package provides essentially the same fonts as yours (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/otf-san-francisco-new-york), should the two merge?

aliu commented on 2024-02-27 12:47 (UTC)

You can copy the licenses from my PKGBUILD (maybe with attribution in yours?) which I extracted from the installation DMGs. They were originally .rtf's.

they don't contain a "monospace" family.

But SF Mono is included?

Bubbu0129 commented on 2024-02-27 04:53 (UTC)

@aliu As of the licenses, I found the ones for SF Pro and SF Compact on the upstream site (https://developer.apple.com/fonts/) by browsing the HTML source. The licenses of SF Mono and SF Text cannot be found there. Maybe their licenses are available on macOS, but I don't have Apple computers. And, IMO the fonts do not meet the 3rd criteria of provides=('ttf-font'), as they don't contain a "monospace" family.

aliu commented on 2024-02-26 13:55 (UTC)

Pretty sure Mono and NY also have their own licenses This should also provide ttf-font, see https://archlinux.org/todo/fix-ttf-font-default-font-setup/

(I made my own package a few months ago...)

ilbuonmarcio commented on 2024-02-22 16:06 (UTC)

@Bubbu0129 I added you as a co-maintainer

Bubbu0129 commented on 2024-02-22 15:10 (UTC) (edited on 2024-02-22 15:11 (UTC) by Bubbu0129)

The script extension fonts are packaged, see (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/apple-sf-script-extension-fonts). This package serves as an optional dependency of the script extension fonts. PS: Maybe list me as co-maintainer to alter the PKGBUILD?

Bubbu0129 commented on 2024-02-22 14:08 (UTC)

@ilbuonmarcio Regarding @jvybihal 's comment, I re-wrote the PKGBUILD following the guidelines on the Wiki. Notably, the Licenses for SF and SF-Compact is added (while others cannot be found on the website), and SF-Arabic removed. IMHO, SF-Arabic, along with SF-Armenian, SF-Georgian and SF-Hebrew should be a separate package, as they are strictly speaking, "SF Script Extensions". How should I post the rewritten PKGBUILD?

Misaka13514 commented on 2024-01-28 05:38 (UTC) (edited on 2024-01-28 06:31 (UTC) by Misaka13514)

arch=(any) https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Font_package_guidelines#Architecture

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last »