Search Criteria
Package Details: rua 0.19.10-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/rua.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | rua |
Description: | AUR helper in Rust providing control, review, patch application and safe build options |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/vn971/rua |
Keywords: | aur rust |
Licenses: | GPL3 |
Submitter: | vasya |
Maintainer: | vasya |
Last Packager: | vasya |
Votes: | 58 |
Popularity: | 1.41 |
First Submitted: | 2018-10-29 14:26 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-01-02 23:51 (UTC) |
Dependencies (9)
- bubblewrap (bubblewrap-gitAUR, bubblewrap-overlayfsAUR, bubblewrap-suid)
- git (git-gitAUR)
- pacman (pacman-pbAUR, pacman-fancy-progress-gitAUR, pacman-gitAUR)
- xz (xz-gitAUR)
- cargo (rust-nightly-binAUR, cargo-gitAUR, rustup-gitAUR, rust, rustup) (make)
- libseccomp (libseccomp-gitAUR) (make)
- bubblewrap-suid (optional) – version of bubblewrap that works on linux-hardened kernel
- shellcheck (shellcheck-gitAUR, shellcheck-binAUR, shellcheck-bin-docAUR) (optional) – allows checking PKGBUILD scripts, taking care of special variables
- sudo (fake-sudoAUR, polkit-fakesudoAUR, sudo-gitAUR, doas-sudo-shimAUR, doas-sudo-shim-minimalAUR, sudo-hgAUR, sudo-selinuxAUR, fudo-gitAUR) (optional) – allows package installation via sudo, if desired
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last »
aconsolelogger commented on 2020-02-07 21:46 (UTC)
Is it possible to configure rua to connect using a socks proxy? There doesn't seem to be a manpage and I couldn't find a .conf file either.
Oscar commented on 2019-11-04 16:20 (UTC) (edited on 2019-11-04 16:20 (UTC) by Oscar)
@vasya: I didn't have untracked directories either, but i now uninstalled it (
pacman -Rs rua
), cloning it into a new folder and executingmakepkg -si
from there. That solved it, though I'm not sure which one of those steps did ^^Anyways, thank (both of) you for your help
vasya commented on 2019-11-04 15:25 (UTC) (edited on 2019-11-04 15:26 (UTC) by vasya)
@Oscar: (with the latest edit). I think the directory is still not clean. Otherwise, why would it, for example, write
Removing existing $pkgdir/ directory...
? Also, I see no logs of actual compilation. Guessing by the timestamps, it didn't happen. Can you try cleaning withgit clean -fd
instead ofgit clean -xfq
? The-d
option forces to remove untracked files, too.Oscar commented on 2019-11-04 13:37 (UTC) (edited on 2019-11-04 13:47 (UTC) by Oscar)
@vasya: of course, are there better places than here to post this than here or is this the correct place?
git clean -xfq && makepkg -si
(edited to change command and output to clean first & prettified output)pacman -Q rua
which rua
orwhich -a rua
vasya commented on 2019-11-04 12:44 (UTC)
@Oscar: can you please give the full output of
makepkg -si
andpacman -Q rua
?Oscar commented on 2019-11-04 12:35 (UTC) (edited on 2019-11-04 12:36 (UTC) by Oscar)
@vasya:
which -a rua
returns the same aswhich rua
The full error is:
vasya commented on 2019-11-04 12:31 (UTC)
@Morganamilo, ah indeed you're right, an older version would simply fail to build. It's probably an issue with PATH indeed. It can be checked with
which -a rua
.Oscar commented on 2019-11-04 12:24 (UTC) (edited on 2019-11-04 12:29 (UTC) by Oscar)
@vasya: It is 0.14.19 and it's the same as the given PKGBUILD. Likewise I'm on the same commit as https://aur.archlinux.org/rua.git (3f1206) and on the master branch
@Morganamilo: The only time I ever used
cargo install
(manually) was to try to update rua as it didn't work throughmakepkg
; it failed telling me that I do not have a default toolchain configured.which rua
gives me/usr/bin/rua
Morganamilo commented on 2019-11-04 12:23 (UTC)
Linking is done at compile time. Even if you were trying to build an older version of rua you'd never get the error that
libalpm.so.11
does not exist. Instead linking will just fail outright.My guess is you've used
cargo install
and now have an old version in PATH, and even though you've installed the new version via makepkg, the old version is still taking priority.which rua
vasya commented on 2019-11-04 12:18 (UTC)
@Oscar: that's very weird. What version is actually written in the PKGBUILD? It should be 0.14.19, as seen here: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=rua Is it also in your local PKGBUILD?
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last »