Initial commit

1 files changed, 65 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/0001-e1000e-Fix-tight-loop-implementation-of-systime-read.patch b/0001-e1000e-Fix-tight-loop-implementation-of-systime-read.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0bea7fe08cd4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/0001-e1000e-Fix-tight-loop-implementation-of-systime-read.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+From 37b12910dd11d9ab969f2c310dc9160b7f3e3405 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Raanan Avargil <raanan.avargil@intel.com>
+Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 16:33:20 +0300
+Subject: [PATCH] e1000e: Fix tight loop implementation of systime read
+ algorithm
+
+Change the algorithm. Read systimel twice and check for overflow.
+If there was no overflow, use the first value.
+If there was an overflow, read systimeh again and use the second
+systimel value.
+
+Signed-off-by: Raanan Avargil <raanan.avargil@intel.com>
+Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
+Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
+---
+ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
+ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+index 24b7269..96a8166 100644
+--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
++++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+@@ -4280,18 +4280,29 @@ static cycle_t e1000e_cyclecounter_read(const struct cyclecounter *cc)
+ 	struct e1000_adapter *adapter = container_of(cc, struct e1000_adapter,
+ 						     cc);
+ 	struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
++	u32 systimel_1, systimel_2, systimeh;
+ 	cycle_t systim, systim_next;
+-	/* SYSTIMH latching upon SYSTIML read does not work well. To fix that
+-	 * we don't want to allow overflow of SYSTIML and a change to SYSTIMH
+-	 * to occur between reads, so if we read a vale close to overflow, we
+-	 * wait for overflow to occur and read both registers when its safe.
++	/* SYSTIMH latching upon SYSTIML read does not work well.
++	 * This means that if SYSTIML overflows after we read it but before
++	 * we read SYSTIMH, the value of SYSTIMH has been incremented and we
++	 * will experience a huge non linear increment in the systime value
++	 * to fix that we test for overflow and if true, we re-read systime.
+ 	 */
+-	u32 systim_overflow_latch_fix = 0x3FFFFFFF;
+-
+-	do {
+-		systim = (cycle_t)er32(SYSTIML);
+-	} while (systim > systim_overflow_latch_fix);
+-	systim |= (cycle_t)er32(SYSTIMH) << 32;
++	systimel_1 = er32(SYSTIML);
++	systimeh = er32(SYSTIMH);
++	systimel_2 = er32(SYSTIML);
++	/* Check for overflow. If there was no overflow, use the values */
++	if (systimel_1 < systimel_2) {
++		systim = (cycle_t)systimel_1;
++		systim |= (cycle_t)systimeh << 32;
++	} else {
++		/* There was an overflow, read again SYSTIMH, and use
++		 * systimel_2
++		 */
++		systimeh = er32(SYSTIMH);
++		systim = (cycle_t)systimel_2;
++		systim |= (cycle_t)systimeh << 32;
++	}
+ 
+ 	if ((hw->mac.type == e1000_82574) || (hw->mac.type == e1000_82583)) {
+ 		u64 incvalue, time_delta, rem, temp;
+-- 
+2.5.1
+