summarylogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/0001-e1000e-Fix-tight-loop-implementation-of-systime-read.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '0001-e1000e-Fix-tight-loop-implementation-of-systime-read.patch')
-rw-r--r--0001-e1000e-Fix-tight-loop-implementation-of-systime-read.patch65
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 65 deletions
diff --git a/0001-e1000e-Fix-tight-loop-implementation-of-systime-read.patch b/0001-e1000e-Fix-tight-loop-implementation-of-systime-read.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 0bea7fe08cd4..000000000000
--- a/0001-e1000e-Fix-tight-loop-implementation-of-systime-read.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,65 +0,0 @@
-From 37b12910dd11d9ab969f2c310dc9160b7f3e3405 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Raanan Avargil <raanan.avargil@intel.com>
-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 16:33:20 +0300
-Subject: [PATCH] e1000e: Fix tight loop implementation of systime read
- algorithm
-
-Change the algorithm. Read systimel twice and check for overflow.
-If there was no overflow, use the first value.
-If there was an overflow, read systimeh again and use the second
-systimel value.
-
-Signed-off-by: Raanan Avargil <raanan.avargil@intel.com>
-Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
-Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
----
- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
-index 24b7269..96a8166 100644
---- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
-+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
-@@ -4280,18 +4280,29 @@ static cycle_t e1000e_cyclecounter_read(const struct cyclecounter *cc)
- struct e1000_adapter *adapter = container_of(cc, struct e1000_adapter,
- cc);
- struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
-+ u32 systimel_1, systimel_2, systimeh;
- cycle_t systim, systim_next;
-- /* SYSTIMH latching upon SYSTIML read does not work well. To fix that
-- * we don't want to allow overflow of SYSTIML and a change to SYSTIMH
-- * to occur between reads, so if we read a vale close to overflow, we
-- * wait for overflow to occur and read both registers when its safe.
-+ /* SYSTIMH latching upon SYSTIML read does not work well.
-+ * This means that if SYSTIML overflows after we read it but before
-+ * we read SYSTIMH, the value of SYSTIMH has been incremented and we
-+ * will experience a huge non linear increment in the systime value
-+ * to fix that we test for overflow and if true, we re-read systime.
- */
-- u32 systim_overflow_latch_fix = 0x3FFFFFFF;
--
-- do {
-- systim = (cycle_t)er32(SYSTIML);
-- } while (systim > systim_overflow_latch_fix);
-- systim |= (cycle_t)er32(SYSTIMH) << 32;
-+ systimel_1 = er32(SYSTIML);
-+ systimeh = er32(SYSTIMH);
-+ systimel_2 = er32(SYSTIML);
-+ /* Check for overflow. If there was no overflow, use the values */
-+ if (systimel_1 < systimel_2) {
-+ systim = (cycle_t)systimel_1;
-+ systim |= (cycle_t)systimeh << 32;
-+ } else {
-+ /* There was an overflow, read again SYSTIMH, and use
-+ * systimel_2
-+ */
-+ systimeh = er32(SYSTIMH);
-+ systim = (cycle_t)systimel_2;
-+ systim |= (cycle_t)systimeh << 32;
-+ }
-
- if ((hw->mac.type == e1000_82574) || (hw->mac.type == e1000_82583)) {
- u64 incvalue, time_delta, rem, temp;
---
-2.5.1
-