1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
|
From 2cf17dff036b8b00dc43747698ae72f51c751361 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 16:45:29 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 07/34] x86/sgx: Add pfn_mkwrite() handler for present PTEs
By default a write page fault on a present PTE inherits the
permissions of the VMA.
When using SGX2, enclave page permissions maintained in the
hardware's Enclave Page Cache Map (EPCM) may change after a VMA
accessing the page is created. A VMA's permissions may thus be
more relaxed than the EPCM permissions even though the VMA was
originally created not to have more relaxed permissions. Following
the default behavior during a page fault on a present PTE while
the VMA permissions are more relaxed than the EPCM permissions would
result in the PTE for an enclave page to be writable even
though the page is not writable according to the EPCM permissions.
The kernel should not allow writing to a page if that page is not
writable: the PTE should accurately reflect the EPCM permissions
while not being more relaxed than the VMA permissions.
Do not blindly accept VMA permissions on a page fault due to a
write attempt to a present PTE. Install a pfn_mkwrite() handler
that ensures that the VMA permissions agree with the EPCM
permissions in this regard.
Before and after page fault flow scenarios
==========================================
Consider the following scenario that will be possible when using SGX2:
* An enclave page exists with RW EPCM permissions.
* A RW VMA maps the range spanning the enclave page.
* The enclave page's EPCM permissions are changed to read-only.
* There is no PTE for the enclave page.
Considering that the PTE is not present in the scenario,
user space will observe the following when attempting to write to the
enclave page from within the enclave:
1) Instruction writing to enclave page is run from within the enclave.
2) A page fault with second and third bits set (0x6) is encountered
and handled by the SGX handler sgx_vma_fault() that installs a
read-only page table entry following previous patch that installs
a PTE with permissions that VMA and enclave agree on
(read-only in this case).
3) Instruction writing to enclave page is re-attempted.
4) A page fault with first three bits set (0x7) is encountered and
transparently (from SGX driver and user space perspective) handled
by the kernel with the PTE made writable because the VMA is
writable.
5) Instruction writing to enclave page is re-attempted.
6) Since the EPCM permissions prevents writing to the page a new page
fault is encountered, this time with the SGX flag set in the error
code (0x8007). No action is taken by the kernel for this page fault
and execution returns to user space.
7) Typically such a fault will be passed on to an application with a
signal but if the enclave is entered with the vDSO function provided
by the kernel then user space does not receive a signal but instead
the vDSO function returns successfully with exception information
(vector=14, error code=0x8007, and address) within the exception
fields within the vDSO function's struct sgx_enclave_run.
As can be observed it is not possible for user space to write to an
enclave page if that page's EPCM permissions do not allow so,
no matter what the VMA or PTE allows.
Even so, the kernel should not allow writing to a page if that page is
not writable. The PTE should accurately reflect the EPCM permissions.
With a pfn_mkwrite() handler that ensures that the VMA permissions
agree with the EPCM permissions user space observes the following
when attempting to write to the enclave page from within the enclave:
1) Instruction writing to enclave page is run from within the enclave.
2) A page fault with second and third bits set (0x6) is encountered
and handled by the SGX handler sgx_vma_fault() that installs a
read-only page table entry following previous patch that installs
a PTE with permissions that VMA and enclave agree on
(read-only in this case).
3) Instruction writing to enclave page is re-attempted.
4) A page fault with first three bits set (0x7) is encountered and
passed to the pfn_mkwrite() handler for consideration. The handler
determines that the page should not be writable and returns SIGBUS.
5) Typically such a fault will be passed on to an application with a
signal but if the enclave is entered with the vDSO function provided
by the kernel then user space does not receive a signal but instead
the vDSO function returns successfully with exception information
(vector=14, error code=0x7, and address) within the exception fields
within the vDSO function's struct sgx_enclave_run.
The accurate exception information supports the SGX runtime, which is
virtually always implemented inside a shared library, by providing
accurate information in support of its management of the SGX enclave.
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c
index 2f80f9e5e8c6..acedccf8c4ef 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c
@@ -225,6 +225,47 @@ static vm_fault_t sgx_vma_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
}
+/*
+ * A fault occurred while writing to a present enclave PTE. Since PTE is
+ * present this will not be handled by sgx_vma_fault(). VMA may allow
+ * writing to the page while enclave (as based on EPCM permissions) does
+ * not. Do not follow the default of inheriting VMA permissions in this
+ * regard, ensure enclave also allows writing to the page.
+ */
+static vm_fault_t sgx_vma_pfn_mkwrite(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+{
+ unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)vmf->address;
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
+ struct sgx_encl_page *entry;
+ struct sgx_encl *encl;
+ vm_fault_t ret = 0;
+
+ encl = vma->vm_private_data;
+
+ /*
+ * It's very unlikely but possible that allocating memory for the
+ * mm_list entry of a forked process failed in sgx_vma_open(). When
+ * this happens, vm_private_data is set to NULL.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(!encl))
+ return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
+
+ mutex_lock(&encl->lock);
+
+ entry = xa_load(&encl->page_array, PFN_DOWN(addr));
+ if (!entry) {
+ ret = VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (!(entry->vm_max_prot_bits & VM_WRITE))
+ ret = VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
+
+out:
+ mutex_unlock(&encl->lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+
static void sgx_vma_open(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
struct sgx_encl *encl = vma->vm_private_data;
@@ -422,6 +463,7 @@ const struct vm_operations_struct sgx_vm_ops = {
.mprotect = sgx_vma_mprotect,
.open = sgx_vma_open,
.access = sgx_vma_access,
+ .pfn_mkwrite = sgx_vma_pfn_mkwrite,
};
/**
--
2.35.1
|