1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
|
From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 13:24:05 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: Use safer kvmalloc_array() where possible
commit fd58f7df2415ef747782e01f94880fefad1247cf upstream.
The kvmalloc_array() function is safer because it has a check for
integer overflows. These sizes come from the user and I was not
able to see any bounds checking so an integer overflow seems like a
realistic concern.
Fixes: 0dcac2725406 ("bpf: Add multi kprobe link")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Yo9VRVMeHbALyjUH@kili
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 6b58fc6813dfc3347d3462dab4c074a38b9a2688..41d0d9657fa196e3a038dc6dfe0a744f5ff9909e 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -2433,7 +2433,7 @@ int bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr
return -EINVAL;
size = cnt * sizeof(*addrs);
- addrs = kvmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ addrs = kvmalloc_array(cnt, sizeof(*addrs), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!addrs)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -2450,7 +2450,7 @@ int bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr
ucookies = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->link_create.kprobe_multi.cookies);
if (ucookies) {
- cookies = kvmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ cookies = kvmalloc_array(cnt, sizeof(*addrs), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!cookies) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto error;
|