Package Details: pycharm 2025.2.4-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pycharm.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pycharm
Description: The only Python IDE you need. Bundled with the official JetBrains Runtime (JBR)
Upstream URL: https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: pycharm-community-edition, pycharm-professional
Provides: pycharm
Replaces: pycharm-professional
Submitter: Xavier
Maintainer: Xavier
Last Packager: Xavier
Votes: 300
Popularity: 4.05
First Submitted: 2025-10-04 18:47 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-10-24 22:12 (UTC)

Dependencies (19)

Required by (0)

Sources (4)

Pinned Comments

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 47 Next › Last »

Xavier commented on 2025-10-04 19:06 (UTC)

Hi folk!

I'm renaming/merging this package pycharm-professional into pycharm. See more:

https://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/2025/04/unified-pycharm/ https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/pycharm-community-edition/-/issues/8

Xavier commented on 2025-09-23 05:40 (UTC)

Yeah, after seeing the discussion in the issue the best is keeping a bungle JRE version here, I'm preparing the package to rename it

Ashark commented on 2025-08-19 14:59 (UTC)

I suggested them to use "pycharm-open-source" or "pycharmium".

For this, I still suggest to rename just to "pycharm".

XenGi commented on 2025-08-19 10:49 (UTC) (edited on 2025-08-19 10:50 (UTC) by XenGi)

If I understand the gitlab thread correctly, The current pycharm-community-edition package will become/stay a pycharm package build from only the open source code from jetbrains. Does this mean that the pycharm-professional package will stay a binary release so people with a pro subscription can use these features?

I guess potential new names will then be pycharm-oss or just pycharm for the package in extra and pycharm-bin for the binary release in the aur. Because it's not the pro feature that is different from the package in extra but that it is build from the official binary release instead of the official source. You can use the binary release without a pro subscription to get some features the open source build doesn't have.

Freso commented on 2025-08-17 18:59 (UTC)

@XenGi If it builds fine with makepkg you should file an issue with yay.

Freso commented on 2025-08-17 18:58 (UTC)

https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/pycharm-community-edition/-/issues/8 tracks the rename of the repository package.

XenGi commented on 2025-04-23 08:03 (UTC) (edited on 2025-04-23 08:16 (UTC) by XenGi)

Even after clearing the cache, pycharm fails to build for me with yay:

==> Starting build()...
:: Building Cython speed-ups
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/xengi/.cache/yay/pycharm-professional/src/pycharm-2025.1/./plugins/python-ce/helpers/pydev/setup_cython.py", line 16, in <module>
    from setuptools import setup
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'setuptools'
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
    Aborting...
 -> error making: pycharm-professional-exit status 4
 -> Failed to install the following packages. Manual intervention is required:
pycharm-professional - exit status 4

makedepends=('python-setuptools' 'cython') seems to be fine though.

Builds just fine with makepkg and pkgctl build.

Xavier commented on 2025-04-17 13:35 (UTC)

I'm agree with having a single package called "pycharm," but where? I just emailed the maintainers of "pycharm-community-edition" to see how best to proceed. While I wait for their response, I've just updated this with the current name. I'll keep you posted on any updates.

Ashark commented on 2025-04-17 08:33 (UTC)

@nonZero Yeah, I agree. Needs renaming to just "pycharm". The question is, will not this name wanted to be used by the official package "pycharm-community-edition" from [extra]?

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 47 Next › Last »