Package Details: acme-sac 0.14-5

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/acme-sac.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: acme-sac
Description: Programmer's editor and shell, running over Inferno
Upstream URL: http://code.google.com/p/acme-sac/
Licenses: GPL
Provides: acme
Submitter: fmoralesc
Maintainer: fmoralesc
Last Packager: fmoralesc
Votes: 10
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2013-07-24 03:20 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2017-01-28 15:55 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

micwoj92 commented on 2024-10-19 23:56 (UTC)

This package should be reuploaded as -bin.

fmoralesc commented on 2017-01-28 15:56 (UTC)

@null, yes, I just noticed, it's updated now (the SCRINFO file too).

null commented on 2016-09-07 19:58 (UTC)

File URL changed to: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive-downloads/v2/code.google.com/acme-sac/acme-sac_0.14_i386.deb

cosarara97 commented on 2016-05-25 22:36 (UTC)

The .SRCINFO file is out of date, doesn't match the PKGBUILD.

beingdaddy commented on 2015-12-12 09:53 (UTC)

Hello you have not updated the file "/usr/share/applications/acme-sac.desktop" changing the field exec from acme to acme-sac have also forgotten a file swap of "vi/vim" :D other than, that all right, bye

fmoralesc commented on 2015-08-26 22:30 (UTC)

@mehlon, I just did both; renamed the binary and made the x86_64 dependencies explicit.

<deleted-account> commented on 2015-08-25 20:05 (UTC)

I use both p9p and acme-sac, so I'd say rename the binary. Also, this package doesn't work on 64-bit without these packages: gcc-multilib lib32-libxext lib32-libx11. Maybe add them as optional dependencies?

fmoralesc commented on 2015-08-12 10:56 (UTC)

@mehlon, Do you think this should conflict with that package or should the binary be renamed?

<deleted-account> commented on 2015-08-11 16:04 (UTC)

this conflicts with plan9port (/bin/acme)

<deleted-account> commented on 2015-08-11 16:04 (UTC)

this actually conflicts with plan9port (/bin/acme)