Package Details: adguardhome-bin 0.107.76-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/adguardhome-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: adguardhome-bin
Description: Network-wide ads and trackers blocking DNS server
Upstream URL: https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome
Keywords: adblock adblocker adguard adguardhome ads antitracker blocker blocking dns dns-blocker dns-sinkhole internet-of-things iot network network-blocker pihole privacy sinkhole tracker-blocker
Licenses: GPL-3.0-only
Conflicts: adguardhome
Provides: adguardhome
Submitter: mvidaldp
Maintainer: AlphaLynx
Last Packager: AlphaLynx
Votes: 9
Popularity: 0.007510
First Submitted: 2021-03-12 18:26 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-05-21 21:28 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

Latest Comments

1 2 3 Next › Last »

Evrenos commented on 2025-11-30 02:44 (UTC)

adguardhome.service checksum fails while building. Kindly fix this.

AlphaLynx commented on 2025-09-02 18:27 (UTC) (edited on 2025-09-02 18:27 (UTC) by AlphaLynx)

Hi @lyk,

I believe the sha256sums in the PKGBUILD are correct, they match exactly the ones you listed and the upstream checksums (https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/releases/download/v0.107.65/checksums.txt) as well. Maybe your download of AdGuardHome_linux_amd64.tar.gz got corrupted and you can try re-downloading?

lyk commented on 2025-08-31 07:05 (UTC) (edited on 2025-08-31 07:16 (UTC) by lyk)

Hi maintainer,

The package seems to have a checksum mismatch after the recent upstream update.

  • Old version: 0.107.64-1
  • New version: 0.107.65-1
  • Error: Validation failed for AdGuardHome_linux_amd64.tar.gz (sha256sums in PKGBUILD needs updating)

Here's the error output for reference:

==> Validating source_x86_64 files with sha256sums...
    AdGuardHome_linux_amd64.tar.gz ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

Could you please update the PKGBUILD with the new checksums? Thanks!

Update: The new checksum is:

sha256sums=('b472fa61b2251758403c4b6662d46b5b5b686b094d290a90acbaa93e19ec7640')
sha256sums_armv7h=('2a0af65aab6f42b31742d0eaecad3c31949421f456665033a5b55486c5f632bf')
sha256sums_aarch64=('75db417e441fa556a89befd888968d1841727190af624794ce63295c6bfbbb03')
sha256sums_i686=('5ce9b82fae95b497d653b8c914f90b29f07e8ec21aa50718b8640082aa427db6')
sha256sums_x86_64=('4962c19375da498d2e5b8ecf3777958240799c0c5cb2b137e3e1e90567131e5d')

AlphaLynx commented on 2025-07-29 16:54 (UTC)

I've adopted and updated the package to the latest upstream release (v0.107.64), fixed the previously mentioned packaging issues, and I rewrote the package source under 0BSD license.

dnaeon commented on 2024-10-14 05:46 (UTC)

0.107.53 version is available.

handsomexdd1024 commented on 2024-09-26 01:13 (UTC)

It's not recommended to install ../adguardhome.service directly. Instead, use source=("adguardhome.service"), with install -Dm644 "adguardhome.service" "${pkgdir}/usr/lib/systemd/system/adguardhome.service".

Kimiblock commented on 2024-04-06 14:58 (UTC) (edited on 2024-04-06 15:21 (UTC) by Kimiblock)

Also, post_remove() is generally not recommended when packaging and this package should provide and conflict adguardhome

Kimiblock commented on 2024-04-06 14:55 (UTC) (edited on 2024-04-06 14:56 (UTC) by Kimiblock)

I have a service file with DynamicUser which is also hardened:

➜  serverOS git:(master) cat /usr/lib/systemd/system/serverOS-AdGuardHome.service
[Unit]
Description=serverOS DNS
PartOf=network-online.target
RequiresMountsFor=/var/lib/private/adguardhome
After=serverOS-clash-meta.service
Before=NetworkManager-wait-online.service

[Service]
Nice=-1
DynamicUser=yes
StartLimitInterval=5
StateDirectory=serverOS-AdGuardHome
WorkingDirectory=/var/lib/private/serverOS-AdGuardHome
ExecStartPre=cp /var/lib/adguardhome/AdGuardHome /var/lib/private/serverOS-AdGuardHome/aghexec
ExecStart=/var/lib/private/serverOS-AdGuardHome/aghexec "-s" "run"
Restart=always
RestartSec=5

OOMPolicy=stop
OOMScoreAdjust=-500

SyslogIdentifier=AdGuardHome
CapabilityBoundingSet=CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE CAP_NET_RAW
AmbientCapabilities=CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE CAP_NET_RAW

ProtectSystem=strict
ProtectHome=yes
PrivateTmp=yes
PrivateDevices=yes
ProtectHostname=yes
ProtectClock=yes
ProtectKernelTunables=yes
ProtectKernelModules=yes
ProtectKernelLogs=yes
ProtectControlGroups=yes
RestrictAddressFamilies=AF_PACKET AF_NETLINK AF_INET AF_INET6
RestrictNamespaces=yes
LockPersonality=yes
MemoryDenyWriteExecute=yes
RestrictRealtime=yes
RestrictSUIDSGID=yes
RemoveIPC=yes
SystemCallArchitectures=native

ProtectProc=invisible
ProcSubset=pid

SystemCallFilter=~@clock
SystemCallFilter=~@cpu-emulation
SystemCallFilter=~@debug
SystemCallFilter=~@module
SystemCallFilter=~@mount
SystemCallFilter=~@obsolete
SystemCallFilter=~@raw-io
SystemCallFilter=~@reboot
SystemCallFilter=~@swap

UMask=077

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target

mvidaldp commented on 2023-09-16 10:46 (UTC)

@procobain yes it does :)