Search Criteria
Package Details: adguardhome-bin 0.107.26-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/adguardhome-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | adguardhome-bin |
Description: | Network-wide ads and trackers blocking DNS server (binary version). |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome |
Keywords: | adblock adblocker adguard adguardhome ads antispam antitracker black blocker blocking dns hole internet-of-things iot network privacy re-router server tracker tracking |
Licenses: | GPL |
Conflicts: | adguardhome |
Provides: | adguardhome-bin |
Submitter: | mvidaldp |
Maintainer: | mvidaldp |
Last Packager: | mvidaldp |
Votes: | 6 |
Popularity: | 0.21 |
First Submitted: | 2021-03-12 18:26 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-03-09 13:59 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
mvidaldp commented on 2023-01-04 13:14 (UTC)
@drrlvn thanks for the suggestion, it's fixed now.
drrlvn commented on 2023-01-03 19:47 (UTC) (edited on 2023-01-03 19:47 (UTC) by drrlvn)
The systemd service file should be installed in /usr/lib/systemd/system/ and not in /etc/systemd/system/ as it is now.
Also, the adguardhome package recently renamed the service from AdGuardHome.service to adguardhome.service, so you should perhaps consider doing the same.
mvidaldp commented on 2022-10-13 12:04 (UTC)
It's for setting up an internal AdGuard, for your local network. More info: https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome#readme https://adguard.com/en/adguard-home/overview.html
bkb commented on 2022-10-13 08:04 (UTC)
Wait, this package is for setting up rapidly AdGuard DNS for the computer to use it instead of default DNS? Or it's a copy of AdGuard internal DNS servers for us to run it locally in our WAN and become ourselves the filter?
Because I would prefer the first one, and if it's not possible, I want to be able to be client of my own server, because I want to filter my DNS requests
MattScherbatsky commented on 2022-01-02 12:57 (UTC) (edited on 2022-01-02 12:58 (UTC) by MattScherbatsky)
v0.107.2
sha256sums:
i686: 5a763a24111bb165175dac583da30f28a26eaa755647813ead22c6bd34ea447f
x86_64:396f610231143e88929c2e3500582e4913ff1d5e45f99564dbe1bce5db598752
aarch64: 633591149e4f93e8850d2beaae8c12a848f4059f2581ce2757afa4c4f0ac6fa3
armv5h: 370038ff08874ea6fa4abdf0cf9c1abaae1ee3f3b1711b28c08cc3f5842081b2
armv6h: c96d118995b866975900817b5a25b2f3586d70a6db94f15a0385d7bf9a5470c9
armv7h: ef02ea830465203c68fb20d3cb16b6889246e8a90f492e5f4455990c489efa4b
mvidaldp commented on 2021-06-08 11:42 (UTC)
@amiad, 0.106.3 is the last stable version to date. 0.107 is still a beta. Create a beta package if you want beta builds.
amiad commented on 2021-05-05 17:40 (UTC)
I do not think it is written in the documentation but this is acceptable in all packages. Why not add the service file to the package?
mvidaldp commented on 2021-05-04 10:46 (UTC)
You're right. I just checked it, sorry for the confusion. It enables and starts the service automatically by running
AdGuardHome -s install
. I'll correct it, but can you point out where the AUR documentation says the services need to be enabled only in the standard way?amiad commented on 2021-05-04 10:30 (UTC)
No,
AdGuardHome -s install
enable the service even if I'm not runningsystemctl enable AdGuardHome
.mvidaldp commented on 2021-05-04 10:27 (UTC)
Can you please elaborate on what is not acceptable?
AdGuardHome -s install
precisely creates the service file. To enable it, you still need to runsystemctl enable AdGuardHome
. Did you properly check myadguardhome-bin.install
instructions file? ;) https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/adguardhome-bin.install?h=adguardhome-bin1 2 Next › Last »