Package Details: adobe-air 2.6-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: adobe-air
Description: Crossplatform desktop applications build using proven web technologies
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: Spider.007
Maintainer: Spider.007
Last Packager: lfleischer
Votes: 367
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2008-05-12 19:35
Last Updated: 2015-06-19 12:17

Dependencies (2)

Required by (3)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 Next › Last »

Spider.007 commented on 2017-01-19 19:09

@felandral Please stop complaining if you don't understand what this package does or contains

felandral commented on 2017-01-11 14:04

@Spider.007 You can't say it is free if it contains - or "wraps" - non-free software. You should at least clarify that in the description (and read again the terms of the GPL).

Spider.007 commented on 2016-12-04 13:25

@felandral this package is a free wrapper around adobe-air-sdk; which itself is not free.

felandral commented on 2016-12-02 14:29

Are you really sure this is a GPL-licensed free software ?

thee233 commented on 2015-03-02 07:22

build terminates with ERROR: Missing package() function in /..../aur-adobe-air/./PKGBUILD
due to obsolte function build() in PKBUILD, to get it working it should be changed to package()

tapia commented on 2014-07-01 22:12

Isn't the latrst version for Linux 2.6?

MagicAndWires commented on 2013-03-13 05:01

@ peke:

That IS quite strange. To be honest, I'm a bit in over my head here.
For the moment, I installed the package and tried it on Cinnamon as well as GNOME and I'd say that that isn't the issue, as I get a blank UI in both cases, on top of that the only real error it throws are the TypeError's.

That said, I have no clue what COULD be causing the problems. I think your best chances are to run the command without the -nodebug flag, see what information you can get off that and take them to the adobe-air-sdk or devolo-dlan-cockpit packages, maybe they can help you better over there.

Either way, you wouldn't be able to get it working with this script, since it pretty much calls the exact same command.


Sorry, it wasn't my intention to imply that, I just figured I'd share my "fix" to circumvent the binaries since it's served me pretty well.

Spider.007 commented on 2013-02-28 09:21

@felixonmars, I still wonder how it got disowned since I didn't do it. Thanks!

felixonmars commented on 2013-02-28 09:12

I take this package since it had been orphaned for weeks (and I use it), and have disowned it now if you are still interested.

Spider.007 commented on 2013-02-28 08:47

How the fuck did felixonmars take this package from me without me knowing?