Package Details: alpine-git 2.21.9999.351.d5f1993-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/alpine-git.git (read-only)
Package Base: alpine-git
Description: Fork of the PINE mail client (git)
Upstream URL: http://alpine.x10host.com/
Licenses: Apache
Conflicts: alpine, pine, re-alpine
Provides: alpine, pine, re-alpine
Replaces: alpine, pine, re-alpine
Submitter: yar
Maintainer: yar
Last Packager: yar
Votes: 47
Popularity: 0.38
First Submitted: 2017-01-31 02:40
Last Updated: 2019-06-21 21:07

Dependencies (5)

Required by (2)

  • topal (requires alpine) (optional)
  • topal (requires re-alpine) (optional)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »

major commented on 2019-06-21 10:40

Your upstream URL seems a bit off. Can you please fix that?

rsrchboy commented on 2018-08-05 03:40

Using pkgname=$gitname-git causes customizepkg to fail with:

/usr/bin/customizepkg: line 167: warning: command substitution: ignored null byte in input
no configuration found for -git in /home/rsrchboy/.customizepkg/ or /etc/customizepkg.d/

kyak commented on 2018-06-23 05:58

Hey everyone, i realized i'm not using alpine anymore since couple of months. Disowning, feel free to keep it going.

kyak commented on 2018-02-01 16:13

999cgm, I'm not sure this is a good idea. If someone could explain the status of this patch, where and who maintains it now.

999cgm commented on 2018-02-01 06:42

kyak: Can you use the all.patch from rsrchboy ?

rsrchboy commented on 2018-01-28 02:19

FWIW, it looks like all.patch was failing on a couple trivial Makefile.am rejections.

I've patched and rebuilt; all looks good. I haven't regenerated the patch, but you can find the old one and the tarball of the patched sources at my fork of this repo: https://github.com/rsrchboy/aur-alpine

HTH!

999cgm commented on 2017-12-11 10:42

Not sure where is ,maybe upstream knows?

kyak commented on 2017-12-10 11:59

And where is all.patch now?

999cgm commented on 2017-12-10 09:01

maildir support is gone from 2.21.99 (it was in all.patch)

kyak commented on 2017-05-12 14:06

If people were to flag packages out of date because of temporary download problems, that wouldn't be very effective. Downloads are working fine now. Don't flag unless you are sure that the download URL is not correct.