Search Criteria
Package Details: alpine 2.26-3
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/alpine.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | alpine |
| Description: | A free software email and usenet client, a rewrite of Pine which was a continuation of the venerable ELM. |
| Upstream URL: | https://alpineapp.email/ |
| Keywords: | cli client e-mail elm email mail newsgroups nntp pine re-alpine usenet |
| Licenses: | Apache |
| Conflicts: | alpine-fancythreading, pico, pine, re-alpine |
| Provides: | pico, pine, re-alpine |
| Replaces: | alpine-fancythreading, pico, pine, re-alpine |
| Submitter: | lightdot |
| Maintainer: | lightdot |
| Last Packager: | lightdot |
| Votes: | 13 |
| Popularity: | 0.34 |
| First Submitted: | 2020-08-21 00:22 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2025-06-16 14:11 (UTC) |
Dependencies (7)
- gettext (gettext-gitAUR, gettext-gitAUR)
- krb5 (krb5-gitAUR)
- libldap (libldap-gnutlsAUR)
- pam (pam-selinuxAUR)
- aspell (aspell-gitAUR, aspell-gitAUR) (optional) – for spell-checking support
- hunspell (hunspell-gitAUR) (optional) – for spell-checking support
- topalAUR (optional) – glue program that links GnuPG and alpine
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »
lightdot commented on 2025-03-03 19:53 (UTC)
@simona, I re-checked and can't replicate, alpine builds in a clean chroot.
My guess is that there's something related to GSSAPI / Kerberos in your build environment that causes this.
simona commented on 2025-03-03 09:47 (UTC)
lightdot commented on 2025-03-03 05:38 (UTC)
@ltskinol, I have now adjusted the PKGBUILD without bumping the package version.
ltskinol commented on 2025-02-18 01:37 (UTC)
Is there any way that Wild_Penguin's change could be incorporated into this package? Alpine hasn't been able to build for quite some time. Thanks!
Ivellios commented on 2025-01-17 04:07 (UTC) (edited on 2025-01-17 04:08 (UTC) by Ivellios)
@lightdot
Thanks for the hint which helps me understand the reason. If due to some reason, the download files got corrupted, or updated but remain same version, pkgbuild will not re-download (check existence) but only compare hash, then reports "not pass the validity check".
A clean download and makepkg can always work, however I thought PKGBUILD should provide an option to validate hash for existing file, if not matching, always re-download, so that sha256sums and latest downloads always pair, instead of simply compare sha256sums with existing file's.
lightdot commented on 2025-01-06 03:53 (UTC)
@Ivellios,
after seeing your report, I was certain the patch got silently updated and thus has a new SHA256 digest. It happened in the past.
But when downloading the patch file to check, I still get the file with the current digest, as listed in the PKGBUILD.
The actual content in mine is dated 2023-12-24 (with two files having a 2023-12-25 date and others 2023-12-24).
The upstream publishes the maildir patch digests here: https://alpineapp.email/alpine/md5/maildir.html
Both the current digest and the one you've reported are there. The current one is listed last. I'm assuming that's the most recent one, but can't be sure.
I'm also not sure why you got served a different patch file. Some kind of caching or download generation on-demand perhaps... Odd.
Ivellios commented on 2024-12-23 06:49 (UTC) (edited on 2024-12-23 06:57 (UTC) by Ivellios)
Wild_Penguin commented on 2024-09-08 22:10 (UTC)
Adding to configure phase:
CFLAGS="-Wno-error=incompatible-pointer-types"
allows alpine to compile. I believe it is OK in this case to work around this, albeit optimally upstream should fix this in the code.
simona commented on 2024-07-16 07:59 (UTC)
can't find https://alpineapp.email/alpine/release/src/alpine-2.26.tar.xz
aiobofh commented on 2024-07-16 07:10 (UTC)
Confirm Wild_Penguin and cmcc as well.
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »