AUR (en) - anbox-image-gapps-rooted

Search Criteria

Enter search criteria

Search by

Keywords

Out of Date

Sort by

Sort order

Per page

Package Details: anbox-image-gapps-rooted 2018.07.19-7

Package Actions

Git Clone URL:	https://aur.archlinux.org/anbox-image-gapps-rooted.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	anbox-image-gapps-rooted
Description:	Android image for running in Anbox with Houdini, OpenGApps and SuperSU
Upstream URL:	https://anbox.io/
Keywords:	anbox gapps houdini image rooted supersu
Licenses:	custom
Conflicts:	anbox-image
Provides:	anbox-image
Submitter:	redchenjs
Maintainer:	redchenjs
Last Packager:	redchenjs
Votes:	7
Popularity:	0.079451
First Submitted:	2019-10-21 05:17 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2020-11-26 11:00 (UTC)

Dependencies (4)

curl (curl-minimal-git, curl-git) (make)
lzip (make)
squashfs-tools (squashfs-tools-git) (make)
unzip (unzip-natspec) (make)

Required by (1)

anbox-git (requires anbox-image)

Sources (9)

Latest Comments

iib commented on 2022-01-09 12:47 (UTC)

malathion commented on 2021-09-22 03:16 (UTC)

Providing anbox-image while also conflicting with anbox-image means this PKGBUILD conflicts with itself and it cannot be installed.

asm0dey commented on 2020-09-17 09:47 (UTC) (edited on 2020-09-17 09:47 (UTC) by asm0dey)

Error happens while installing: Maximum (50) redirects followed https://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/opengapps/x86_64/20200916/open_gapps-x86_64-7.1-pico-20200916.zip

Zame commented on 2020-04-13 07:41 (UTC) (edited on 2020-04-13 07:42 (UTC) by Zame)

Hi, guys Manjaro KDE I installed this image. Instruction https://forum.manjaro.org/t/running-android-applications-on-arch-using-anbox/53332 (excluding 2.1) I managed to launch but it gets stuck on loading and then the windows just closes

redchenjs commented on 2020-03-29 11:16 (UTC)

Hi @redfanglicker, It seems to be a network issue, I have changed the download link to https, maybe this will help :)

normalname012 commented on 2020-03-29 10:27 (UTC)

I keep getting this error

Failure while downloading http://build.anbox.io/android-images/2018/07/19/android_amd64.img

Anty0 commented on 2020-01-20 02:04 (UTC)

@csolisr Unfortunately, it isn't that easy... :(

Magisk works by patching Andorids boot image - something Anbox does not use, since it works on top of your system, instead of emulating whole Android. (You would have to patch your system/kernel.)

Making Magisk compatible with this setup seems impossible at this point... You would have to completely rewrite Magisk... And even with working implementation, you won't (probably) get to pass SafetyNet...

Also Magisks main goal is to provide you way to modify your system without actually modifying it (without modifying system partition). Is that really something you need on system which you have completely under your control?

And don't get me wrong, Magisks idea is a brilliant and I'm glad everybody can have something like this on phone, it just isn't something to be used with specific implementations, like Anbox, since the way Magisk works just isn't compatible with the way Anbox works. :)

csolisr commented on 2020-01-19 19:05 (UTC)

Any plans to create a package that includes Magisk instead of SuperSU? Magisk not only has a built-in super-user, but it also includes an option to hide the status of the machine so it can pass SafetyNet, for example.

CurtisLeeBolin commented on 2019-12-06 16:53 (UTC)

==> ERROR: Failure while downloading https://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/opengapps/x86_64/20191204/open_gapps-x86_64-7.1-pico-20191204.zip Aborting...

redchenjs commented on 2019-10-22 18:51 (UTC)

@yochananmarqos: thanks for catching that, it has been fixed now.

yochananmarqos commented on 2019-10-22 18:04 (UTC)

There are no dependencies, they're all make dependencies. sed is not necessary as it's part of the base-devel group.

makedepends=('curl' 'lzip' 'squashfs-tools' 'unzip')

redchenjs commented on 2019-10-21 05:58 (UTC)

Hi @diabonas, thanks for your suggestion, I have uploaded a new package with a more specific name as anbox-image-gapps-rooted and filed a merge request, which will make the users more aware of the differences between these packages.

diabonas commented on 2019-10-20 19:28 (UTC)

Okay, in that case I suggest uploading this package under the new name anbox-image-gapps-supersu, since I understand this is the discerning feature, and file a merge request so that anbox-image-houdini-gapps is replaced by anbox-image-gapps-supersu. Is that a solution that works for you both, redchenjs and yochananmarqos?

redchenjs commented on 2019-10-20 18:19 (UTC)

Hi @diabonas, Of course, it is not feasible to create new packages for every possible feature that could be added, but for SuperSU, I think it's better to keep a separate package since it will replace the underlying components of the system in the image, which may cause problems for users who don't need it. A separate package is very useful for users who want a Rooted image, while others can still use the anbox-image-gapps. I have already described the difference in the pkgdesc. If you think this is not enough, I can make a deletion request and create a package with a more appropriate name.

diabonas commented on 2019-10-20 15:47 (UTC) (edited on 2019-10-20 15:47 (UTC) by diabonas)

Thank you for your clarifications regarding the differences between the two packages. According to the AUR submission guidelines

Check the AUR if the package already exists. Do not create duplicate packages.

Make sure the package you want to upload is useful. Will anyone else want to use this package? Is it extremely specialized? If more than a few people would find this package useful, it is appropriate for submission.

I am not convinced that having 'completely different processing for "Houdini"' warrants uploading a new package according to these guidelines: you don't explain anywhere what the benefits of your different approach are, so users will be confused about multiple seemingly identical packages in the AUR. If there is a problem with the approach taken in anbox-image-gapps, it should be reported to the maintainer of this package and fixed there instead of creating a new package.

Regarding the addition of new features, I can at least see the possible benefit this gives, although the package should be called anbox-image-gapps-supersu in this case. However I feel this could also be integrated directly into the older package instead of creating a new one since the difference is not big and it is not feasible to create new packages for every possible feature that could be added. yochananmarqos, as the maintainer of anbox-image-gapps, could you comment on this?

redchenjs commented on 2019-10-20 15:26 (UTC)

Hi @diabonas, "anbox-image-gapps" and this package have completely different processing for "Houdini", and this package adds SuperSU and some extra media codec profiles to the image, I don't understand why you think these two packages are identical. Maybe there are problems with my PKGBUILD? If so, please let me know.

diabonas commented on 2019-10-20 14:57 (UTC)

This is an exact duplicate of the previous AUR package anbox-image-gapps-houdini that I deleted as a duplicate of anbox-image-gapps due to merge request PRQ#16362. If you don't agree with this decision, you are very welcome to reply to the merge request (or in the comments of this package). I give you 48 hours to do this, otherwise I will delete this package.

Reuploading explicitly deleted packages without explanation hoping that nobody will notice is acting in bad faith. If you continue doing that, your account will be suspended.

Arch Linux User Repository