AUR (en) - android-ndk

Search Criteria

Package Details: android-ndk r27-1

Git Clone URL:	https://aur.archlinux.org/android-ndk.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	android-ndk
Description:	Android C/C++ developer kit
Upstream URL:	https://developer.android.com/ndk/
Licenses:	GPL, custom, LGPL
Replaces:	android-ndk64
Submitter:	sergej
Maintainer:	migrev
Last Packager:	migrev
Votes:	278
Popularity:	0.015829
First Submitted:	2009-06-26 09:29 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2024-08-07 09:27 (UTC)

Git Clone URL:

https://aur.archlinux.org/android-ndk.git (read-only, click to copy)

Package Base:

android-ndk

Description:

Android C/C++ developer kit

Upstream URL:

https://developer.android.com/ndk/

Licenses:

GPL, custom, LGPL

Replaces:

android-ndk64

Submitter:

sergej

Maintainer:

migrev

Last Packager:

migrev

Votes:

278

Popularity:

0.015829

First Submitted:

2009-06-26 09:29 (UTC)

Last Updated:

2024-08-07 09:27 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next › Last »

<deleted-account> commented on 2014-09-06 22:53 (UTC)

I had a little time to implement what I meant. Here's the updated files (I also cleaned up the PKGBUILD a little) https://gist.github.com/anonymous/fcb67f9194d3862b008e

<deleted-account> commented on 2014-08-30 23:21 (UTC)

I think both are useful at the same time (well, will be, once android L is released). I would set ANDROID_NDK_32 and ANDROID_NDK_64 in the profile.sh, and (perhaps) make ANDROID_NDK an alias for ANDROID_NDK_32.

xyproto commented on 2014-08-30 15:26 (UTC)

frownlee, my assumption was that people would just need one of the packages (android-ndk32). Do you need both packages? I agree that making them not conflict and just set ANDROID_SDK to ndk32 version might be better.

<deleted-account> commented on 2014-08-29 20:02 (UTC)

Why not have each package set the ANDROID_NDK_{32,64} environment variable, and make the user make ANDROID_NDK to point to one or the other? One environment variable not even set by upstream seems like a strange reason to have the packages conflict.

dront78 commented on 2014-08-29 18:13 (UTC)

You are welcome! nothing changed within update :D

muskitu commented on 2014-08-08 20:06 (UTC)

Ok, sorry xyproto, it was my fault. Thank you! :D Thank you too dront78! :D

dront78 commented on 2014-08-08 19:49 (UTC)

hi here is my filesystem after install drwxr-xr-x 10 124982 5000 4096 июл 3 00:06 android-ndk-r10 and here is a cat /etc/profile.d/android-ndk32.sh export PATH=$PATH:/opt/android-ndk32 export ANDROID_NDK=/opt/android-ndk32 please fix uid:gid and environment path also as soon the packages are conflict /opt/android-ndk should be ok for both

xyproto commented on 2014-08-08 11:34 (UTC)

There is a conflict between android-ndk32 and android-ndk64 because ANDROID_NDK is set in the shell script in /etc/profile.d/ and ANDROID_NDK can't point to both of them at the same time. The idea is that you will have to choose one of them, depending on which one you need (most likely only android-ndk32). This is mentioned in the comments in the PKGBUILD. You can still install both by either forcing the install, editing the PKGBUILD or extracting the tarballs manually (and then deciding what to do about the script in profile.d). It is downloading both, because it is needed to build the split package. This is one of the reasons for why it may be a better candidate for [community] than AUR.