Just wondering, is there a reason to use '655' mode for data files (instead of 644)?
Search Criteria
Package Details: android-studio 2024.2.1.12-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/android-studio.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | android-studio |
Description: | The official Android IDE (Stable branch) |
Upstream URL: | https://developer.android.com/ |
Keywords: | android |
Licenses: | Apache |
Submitter: | TamCore |
Maintainer: | kordianbruck (SailReal) |
Last Packager: | SailReal |
Votes: | 1081 |
Popularity: | 7.14 |
First Submitted: | 2013-05-15 19:45 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-12-02 21:46 (UTC) |
Dependencies (8)
- alsa-lib
- freetype2 (freetype2-qdoledAUR, freetype2-macosAUR, freetype2-gitAUR)
- libxrender
- libxtst
- which (busybox-coreutilsAUR)
- gtk2 (gtk2-maemoAUR, gtk2-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR) (optional) – GTK+ look and feel
- libgl (nvidia-340xx-utilsAUR, libglvnd-gitAUR, amdgpu-pro-oglp-legacyAUR, amdgpu-pro-oglpAUR, libglvnd) (optional) – emulator support
- ncurses5-compat-libsAUR (optional) – native debugger support
Required by (8)
- android-material-icons (optional)
- android-studio-launcher
- flutter-beta (optional)
- flutter-dev (optional)
- flutter-git (optional)
- flutter-intellij-patch (optional)
- jdk-android-studio
- kode-studio-bin (optional)
Sources (3)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 .. 53 Next › Last »
sjakub commented on 2013-06-05 17:34 (UTC)
sjakub commented on 2013-06-05 04:34 (UTC)
Also, a version of the PKGBUILD that doesn't display the update window: http://pastebin.com/izEkrPgm
sjakub commented on 2013-06-05 04:04 (UTC)
I can't find a way around the GUI update procedure.
However, the return value problem is simple.
I also fixed permissions, simplified the script
and applied other changes suggested here.
Here is the PKGBUILD: http://pastebin.com/4LLe4J7m
And simplified android-studio.desktop file: http://pastebin.com/jDFnQHkC
The only other needed file is the android-studio.install, which is the same...
TamCore commented on 2013-06-04 17:23 (UTC)
@mus
1.) We'll see if there are problems in the future.
2.) I had some problems while packaging without chmod'ing
@sjakub
_build=130.687321
_patch=130.692269
[...]
prepare() {
....
java -classpath "${srcdir}/${_patch}.jar" com.intellij.updater.Runner install "${srcdir}/${pkgname}"
....
}
But two things are crappy: 1.) It opens a crappy window and 2.) the return value kills makepkg.
<deleted-account> commented on 2013-06-04 15:03 (UTC)
uhm, I just noticed that the upstream tarball completely contains the android-sdk and platform tools. Why not ship those as well and add replace/provides for android-sdk and android-sdk-platform-tools? This would give users 2 less AUR packages to worry about. Who knows, maybe this may even cause problems in the future if the android-sdk and android-studio packages don't perfectly match.
Also, why are you running chmod -R 755 on the whole directory in the PKGBUILD?
sjakub commented on 2013-06-04 15:01 (UTC)
Oh, I know ;) But it means there is really no simple way to update this package. Unless you can come up with something, in which case you should share it :P
TamCore commented on 2013-06-03 16:50 (UTC)
I got the patch url but the automated patching in the packaging process isn't that easy.
In case you're interested: http://dl-sdk.appspot.com/as/patches/AI-130.687321-130.692269-patch-unix.jar
sjakub commented on 2013-06-03 15:58 (UTC)
Also, whoever marked this as out of date, please provide the URL to the new version. As far as I can tell, there is no new bundled version, just a "patch".
Pinned Comments
C0rn3j commented on 2024-10-26 17:04 (UTC)
2024.2 added a Wayland backend, not enabled by default. Works fine for me so far.
https://blog.jetbrains.com/platform/2024/07/wayland-support-preview-in-2024-2/