Package Details: apple-fonts 1.0.5-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/apple-fonts.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: apple-fonts
Description: Apple San Francisco, New York fonts, directly from Apple official source
Upstream URL: https://developer.apple.com/fonts/
Licenses: custom
Provides: ttf-font
Submitter: ilbuonmarcio
Maintainer: ilbuonmarcio (Bubbu0129)
Last Packager: Bubbu0129
Votes: 29
Popularity: 0.36
First Submitted: 2021-03-13 19:14 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-02-27 14:07 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last »

ilbuonmarcio commented on 2024-02-22 16:06 (UTC)

@Bubbu0129 I added you as a co-maintainer

Bubbu0129 commented on 2024-02-22 15:10 (UTC) (edited on 2024-02-22 15:11 (UTC) by Bubbu0129)

The script extension fonts are packaged, see (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/apple-sf-script-extension-fonts). This package serves as an optional dependency of the script extension fonts. PS: Maybe list me as co-maintainer to alter the PKGBUILD?

Bubbu0129 commented on 2024-02-22 14:08 (UTC)

@ilbuonmarcio Regarding @jvybihal 's comment, I re-wrote the PKGBUILD following the guidelines on the Wiki. Notably, the Licenses for SF and SF-Compact is added (while others cannot be found on the website), and SF-Arabic removed. IMHO, SF-Arabic, along with SF-Armenian, SF-Georgian and SF-Hebrew should be a separate package, as they are strictly speaking, "SF Script Extensions". How should I post the rewritten PKGBUILD?

Misaka13514 commented on 2024-01-28 05:38 (UTC) (edited on 2024-01-28 06:31 (UTC) by Misaka13514)

arch=(any) https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Font_package_guidelines#Architecture

aliu commented on 2023-10-08 16:18 (UTC)

Should this provide ttf-font?

ilbuonmarcio commented on 2023-01-09 20:09 (UTC)

@jvybihal suggest a PKGBUILD patch and I'll have a look!

jvybihal commented on 2022-10-31 08:39 (UTC)

Just a thought, but there is too much packages with apple fonts all over the aur. (mis)labeled and/or sourced from whatever.

This package apple-fonts is the one I decided to use. It installs what I expect and works. But it would make much more sense, if this was just a meta package and pulls each font package in the "depends".

Or... if it itself wants to installs the fonts, it should definitely include properly defined provides and conflicts.

Also it does NOT check checksums of what it downloads and does download stuff in the package(), which, as I understand, is really not a good thing (build should be reproducible offline). This is not how PKGBUILDs should be written.

Thoughts?

ilbuonmarcio commented on 2022-06-22 10:09 (UTC)

Builds correctly for me with makepkg -si, unflagged as out-of-date

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last »