I dont' know what's the best practice reagard this point, panth0r.
If you tell me that this is the best thing to do, for me it's ok and i proceed to add ruby-coderay in the dependencies, even tought makepkg fails.
According to this:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=149313
You're right, so i'll proceed.
Thanks for pointing this out.
Search Criteria
Package Details: arcadia 1.1.1-0
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/arcadia.git (read-only) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | arcadia |
| Description: | A light IDE for Ruby |
| Upstream URL: | http://arcadia.rubyforge.org/ |
| Licenses: | |
| Submitter: | None |
| Maintainer: | fcolista |
| Last Packager: | fcolista |
| Votes: | 6 |
| Popularity: | 0.028714 |
| First Submitted: | 2008-09-06 17:13 |
| Last Updated: | 2015-12-01 07:25 |
Dependencies (5)
- ruby (ruby1.8, rubinius-ruby)
- ruby-coderay>1.0
- ctags (ctags-php, ctags_as3_haxe, guile-emacs-git, universal-ctags-git, vim-jp-ctags) (optional) – other languages support
- ruby-debug (optional) – debug support
- xterm (jbxvt-git, xterm-fake) (optional) – termina integration
Required by (0)
Sources (1)
Latest Comments
fcolista commented on 2013-08-03 08:15
panth0r commented on 2013-07-17 10:29
I may not be understanding you correctly, but you certainly can add packages from the AUR to the PKGBUILD's dependencies array; makepkg will simply fail if dependencies aren't found (and, to me, this sounds like a "Good Thing," I'd like to have a package's dependencies met so I'm not installing something that won't work).
Moreover, if you're using at least one popular pacman wrapper/AUR helper, you'll be asked to install unmet dependencies before moving forward with an installation, for example (snipped output follows and I know I'm the worst kind of Arch user to use Yaourt):
==> iowolfet-hg dependencies:
- mesa (already installed)
- libxext (already installed)
- enemy-territory (building from AUR)
- mercurial (package found)
fcolista commented on 2013-07-01 08:10
Yes, it is normal.
ruby-coderay is found only in AUR, and you have to install it by hand, since i cannot add it to dependencis.
You should "yaourt -S ruby-coderay" in order to get arcadia work.
I'm going to add this note in post-install.
nichdel commented on 2013-06-30 22:14
Arcadia isn't starting for me.
I did:
yaourt -S arcadia
and it properly installed arcadia and ruby.
Yet when I attempt to start arcadia it complains that it cannot find 'coderay'.
mrunion commented on 2013-04-04 02:23
Whatever you did worked! Thanks!
fcolista commented on 2013-04-03 11:24
Fixed compilation.
mrunion commented on 2013-04-03 01:24
I get the error when trying to install. I enter:
yaourt -S arcadia
The build starts, then the error happens. See the following:
==> Building and installing package
==> Making package: arcadia 0.12.1-0 (Tue Apr 2 21:22:25 EDT 2013)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving Sources...
-> Downloading arcadia-0.12.1.gem...
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- 0:00:15 --:--:-- 0
100 664k 100 664k 0 0 20096 0 0:00:33 0:00:33 --:--:-- 149k
==> Validating source files with md5sums...
arcadia-0.12.1.gem ... Passed
==> Extracting Sources...
-> Extracting arcadia-0.12.1.gem with bsdtar
==> Entering fakeroot environment...
==> Starting build()...
ERROR: Use --install-dir or --user-install but not both
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build arcadia.
fcolista commented on 2013-04-02 07:36
Hi mrunion.
Sorry, but i'm not sure i've understand your question.
When exactly do you get this error?
mrunion commented on 2013-04-02 01:10
Sorry for my "noobishness", but how do you get past the error message:
ERROR: Use --install-dir or --user-install but not both
fcolista commented on 2013-01-23 06:53
updated to 0.12.1