The updated package is on aur4.
Search Criteria
Package Details: arcadia 0.13.1-0
Package Actions
- View PKGBUILD
- Download tarball
- Search wiki
- Flagged out-of-date (2015-05-11)
| Package Base: | arcadia |
|---|---|
| Description: | A light IDE for Ruby |
| Upstream URL: | http://arcadia.rubyforge.org/ |
| Category: | devel |
| Licenses: | |
| Submitter: | None |
| Maintainer: | fcolista |
| Last Packager: | fcolista |
| Votes: | 4 |
| First Submitted: | 2008-09-06 17:13 |
| Last Updated: | 2014-07-09 11:05 |
Dependencies (2)
Required by (0)
Sources
Latest Comments
Comment by fcolista
Comment by fcolista
I dont' know what's the best practice reagard this point, panth0r.
If you tell me that this is the best thing to do, for me it's ok and i proceed to add ruby-coderay in the dependencies, even tought makepkg fails.
According to this:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=149313
You're right, so i'll proceed.
Thanks for pointing this out.
Comment by panth0r
I may not be understanding you correctly, but you certainly can add packages from the AUR to the PKGBUILD's dependencies array; makepkg will simply fail if dependencies aren't found (and, to me, this sounds like a "Good Thing," I'd like to have a package's dependencies met so I'm not installing something that won't work).
Moreover, if you're using at least one popular pacman wrapper/AUR helper, you'll be asked to install unmet dependencies before moving forward with an installation, for example (snipped output follows and I know I'm the worst kind of Arch user to use Yaourt):
==> iowolfet-hg dependencies:
- mesa (already installed)
- libxext (already installed)
- enemy-territory (building from AUR)
- mercurial (package found)
Comment by fcolista
Yes, it is normal.
ruby-coderay is found only in AUR, and you have to install it by hand, since i cannot add it to dependencis.
You should "yaourt -S ruby-coderay" in order to get arcadia work.
I'm going to add this note in post-install.
Comment by nichdel
Arcadia isn't starting for me.
I did:
yaourt -S arcadia
and it properly installed arcadia and ruby.
Yet when I attempt to start arcadia it complains that it cannot find 'coderay'.
Comment by mrunion
Whatever you did worked! Thanks!
Comment by fcolista
Fixed compilation.
Comment by mrunion
I get the error when trying to install. I enter:
yaourt -S arcadia
The build starts, then the error happens. See the following:
==> Building and installing package
==> Making package: arcadia 0.12.1-0 (Tue Apr 2 21:22:25 EDT 2013)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving Sources...
-> Downloading arcadia-0.12.1.gem...
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- 0:00:15 --:--:-- 0
100 664k 100 664k 0 0 20096 0 0:00:33 0:00:33 --:--:-- 149k
==> Validating source files with md5sums...
arcadia-0.12.1.gem ... Passed
==> Extracting Sources...
-> Extracting arcadia-0.12.1.gem with bsdtar
==> Entering fakeroot environment...
==> Starting build()...
ERROR: Use --install-dir or --user-install but not both
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build arcadia.
Comment by fcolista
Hi mrunion.
Sorry, but i'm not sure i've understand your question.
When exactly do you get this error?
Comment by mrunion
Sorry for my "noobishness", but how do you get past the error message:
ERROR: Use --install-dir or --user-install but not both
Comment by fcolista
updated to 0.12.1
Comment by fcolista
updated to 0.12.0
Comment by fcolista
updated to latest version
Comment by starfry
The latest version is 0.11.1.1. You can install this straight as a gem. If you are using rvm:
$ rvm use ruby-1.9.3-p0
$ gem install ruby-debug19 --with-ruby-include=$rvm_path/src/ruby-1.9.3-p0
$ gem install arcadia
Comment by tdy
0.9.2
Comment by stefanwilkens
0.9.0. is out :)
Comment by tdy
0.8.1
Anonymous comment
Version 0.8.1 is out