Package Details: arch-log 0.4.0-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: arch-log
Description: Quickly check commit log of Arch and AUR packages.
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: Necoro
Maintainer: Necoro
Last Packager: Necoro
Votes: 7
Popularity: 0.151136
First Submitted: 2023-07-16 14:46 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2023-10-03 14:13 (UTC)

Dependencies (1)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

Necoro commented on 2023-09-24 19:17 (UTC)

Hi @df8oe,

thanks for feedback, I'm glad you find this tool helpful.

Regarding the aarch64: Could you open a ticket in GitHub with the information you have (best one per arch that needs addition if they don't share the resources)? Ideally you can also provide a package that only exists there, so I can test accordingly.

As I need to do some digging, reading and experimenting, it will need some time, though.

df8oe commented on 2023-09-23 13:26 (UTC) (edited on 2023-09-23 13:29 (UTC) by df8oe)

I love arch-log. It saves tons of time if I had to dig through pacman logs manually. So I wanted to use it at my raspberry pi, too. There an aarch64 architecture is running. Arch-log is not composed for usage on aarch64 - I know. But that does not mean it cannot be tested :) Conclusion: it does not run o-o-o. The problem is the path and the search possibility on aarch64-repo. At x86 repos the URL is
At aarch64 it looks like
but I cannot find a "search"-funkction. Do you think it is possible to adapt arch-log to arm architectures (aarch64, armv7h)? Many users run raspberry pis "headless" for server / house automation e.g. and there it would be a great help if something went wrong during an update.

df8oe commented on 2023-09-20 17:43 (UTC)

Thank you for implementing option for packages which are available in multiple repos. I confirm that it is working perfectly and the implementation is great!

WSDMatty commented on 2023-07-17 08:10 (UTC)

Created a -git 'development' version, for funsies. @Necoro I removed the check() in the git package because it seems there are actually no tests?

Necoro commented on 2023-07-16 21:35 (UTC)

@yochananmarqos: Checked it twice and triple. It really works fine with -flto now [and produces slightly larger binaries when it's enabled chuckle]. Updated my other package too.

yochananmarqos commented on 2023-07-16 18:52 (UTC)

@Necoro: Don't take my word for it, build it in a clean chroot like I did and see it successfully build. ;)

Necoro commented on 2023-07-16 18:51 (UTC)

@yochananmarqos: Taking your word for it, I uploaded pkgrel 2 with the option restriction removed. Thanks.

yochananmarqos commented on 2023-07-16 18:30 (UTC)

@Necoro: Ah, sorry. The issue is indeed still open. Either way, this builds fine with LTO enabled like I mentioned.

Necoro commented on 2023-07-16 16:58 (UTC)

@yochananmarqos: The linked issue is still open, though. What are you referring to?

yochananmarqos commented on 2023-07-16 15:48 (UTC)

@Necoro: It builds fine with LTO enabled. Notice the issue you linked was closed last year.