Package Details: armory 0.96.5-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/armory.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: armory
Description: Full-featured Bitcoin wallet management application
Upstream URL: https://github.com/goatpig/BitcoinArmory
Licenses: MIT, AGPL3
Conflicts: armory, armory-bin, armory-git, armory-goatpig-git
Provides: armory
Submitter: kokx
Maintainer: jon
Last Packager: jon
Votes: 40
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2013-03-11 20:32 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2019-02-19 18:23 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 Next › Last »

jon commented on 2019-02-19 18:23 (UTC)

Updated to 0.96.5. A changelog is available here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088934.0

jon commented on 2018-04-27 20:24 (UTC)

Updated to 0.96.4. A changelog is available here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3363679.0

<deleted-account> commented on 2017-12-17 12:45 (UTC)

error when building ?

make[2]: Leaving directory '/user/.cache/pacaur/armory/src/armory_0.96.3.99-src/cppForSwig/cryptopp'

make[1]: *** [Makefile:1537: all-recursive] Error 1

make[1]: Leaving directory '/user/.cache/pacaur/armory/src/armory_0.96.3.99-src/cppForSwig'

make: *** [Makefile:412: all-recursive] Error 1

==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().

Aborting...

:: failed to build armory package(s)

jon commented on 2017-10-13 02:48 (UTC) (edited on 2017-10-13 02:57 (UTC) by jon)

I've taken over as maintainer and have updated the package to 0.96.3.99 (0.96.4 RC1). I've improved the desktop entries to use the ones provided by BitcoinArmory, and I've added GPG validation for the source package. Let me know if you have any suggestions for the PKGBUILD. 0.96.4 RC1 Changelog: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2227856.0

chrcoe commented on 2017-06-22 15:17 (UTC)

can you update the PKGBUILD to use python2-twisted instead of twisted as a dependency? It was breaking with new library changes. When I made this change locally it was able to finish with system updates.

meZee commented on 2016-02-06 23:04 (UTC) (edited on 2016-02-06 23:05 (UTC) by meZee)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1351792.0 (The End of the Road for Armory) "... In immediate future, Farhod (goatpig) has indicated that he will take over the reigns of the public side of the Armory project. He also has my utmost confidence and trust, and demonstrated a selfless passion for growing Armory for the sake of the Bitcoin community. Armory may be revived in the future, but in the short-term the rest of team has to move on without it. ..." - Alan C. Reiner(etothepi) --------------------- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1351924.0 (Moving forward with Armory) "... Now, moving forward, I appear to be the deranged hippie of the band, for I still believe I have a few punches left in me. As such, I will be resuming open source development of Armory. It will take place on my own public github repo, forked from the last state of Alan's own repo. This means 2 things: 1) Development has to resume from 0.93.3 due to the IP entanglement. It means I'll be spending my first few weeks as lead reimplementing the DB changes behind version 0.94. 2) All the IP up to 0.93.3 is property of Armory Technologies Inc. (ATI), under GNU Affero General Public License, Version 3. 3) All new code I submit to my fork will be my property, under the MIT license. ..." - Farhod(goatpig)

2bluesc commented on 2015-10-30 17:25 (UTC)

Any interest in including GPG signature for verification? I can't find any signatures for the v0.93.3 source release tarball. Thoughts? Pacman supports signature files and I have an example on one of my projects [1]. The github repo has signed tags: $ git verify-tag v0.93.3 gpg: Signature made Thu 29 Oct 2015 08:55:31 AM PDT using RSA key ID 98832223 gpg: Good signature from "Alan C. Reiner (Offline Signing Key) <alan@bitcoinarmory.com>" [full] gpg: aka "Alan C. Reiner (Armory Signing Key) <etotheipi@gmail.com>" [full] gpg: aka "Alan C. Reiner (Armory Signing Key) <alan.reiner@gmail.com>" [full] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=linux-can-dkms

dkaparis commented on 2015-09-28 19:20 (UTC)

The application icon does not display in menu on Xfce. Probably better to use the .png icon in .desktop file?

1 2 3 4 Next › Last »