Package Details: asterisk-g729 1:1.4.3.r5.3855cec2ef-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: asterisk-g729
Description: G.729 codec for Asterisk open source PBX
Upstream URL:
Keywords: asterisk codec g729 voip
Licenses: GPL-3.0-only
Submitter: post-factum
Maintainer: post-factum
Last Packager: post-factum
Votes: 4
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2017-04-05 17:37 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-02-22 16:52 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

alerque commented on 2020-05-24 21:01 (UTC)

@TheGoliath This package does not update to and build the latest HEAD, hence it should not be -git as it is not a VCS package. Lots of packages use git as a transport instead of curl <tarball>, that doesn't make them VCS packages.

post-factum commented on 2020-05-22 13:27 (UTC)

No, this is a revision-based normal package, not a git package.

post-factum commented on 2020-02-27 13:33 (UTC)

Well, I use it myself, and so far it seems it works with 17.2.0.

alerque commented on 2020-02-27 13:18 (UTC)

@post-factum Yes, that's what I mean. Although I think I would be even stricter about the versions. Asterisk has a habit of changing significant things in point releases too. I would suggest depends=('asterisk<17.3.0'). Hopefully they wont' break anything in patch versions! But before you do, maybe make sure it actually works with 17.2 as well since I haven't tested it yet.

post-factum commented on 2020-02-27 12:59 (UTC)

Do you mean something like depends=('asterisk<18.0.0') for current revision?

alerque commented on 2020-02-27 11:36 (UTC)

This package should probably specify an upper version bound for what asterisk version it supports. Since it routinely falls behind the latest asterisk, people that use it should be warned when updating asterisk that this well need to be updated first. That way they can decide to hold off until g729 is updated if they require that for production.

post-factum commented on 2020-02-22 16:50 (UTC)

I have no idea if it works on armv7h.

FixedWing commented on 2020-02-22 14:51 (UTC)

Any reason why this would not also work with armv7h architecture? At the moment it is limited to x86_64.


johny77 commented on 2017-10-09 10:46 (UTC)

Excellent job. Works! If I could, I would like to give You A++++++ for support. Thank You.