Package Details: atom-editor-beta 1.16.0.beta0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/atom-editor-beta.git (read-only)
Package Base: atom-editor-beta
Description: Hackable text editor for the 21st Century, built using web technologies on the Electron framework - Beta channel.
Upstream URL: https://github.com/atom/atom
Keywords: atom beta editor
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: atom-editor-beta-arch, atom-editor-beta-bin
Submitter: hydraz
Maintainer: webslave (fusion809)
Last Packager: fusion809
Votes: 11
Popularity: 0.465053
First Submitted: 2015-12-28 17:00
Last Updated: 2017-03-11 17:01

Latest Comments

krd commented on 2017-02-22 19:30

Also hitting the same error as fightcookie and SanpoChew
> Error: Module version mismatch. Expected 46, got 48.

fightcookie commented on 2017-02-14 00:50

getting the exact same error as SanpoChew

SanpoChew commented on 2017-02-08 23:11

Getting the below error on 1.15.0-beta0

Node: v6.9.4
Npm: v3.10.5
Installing script dependencies
Installing apm
module.js:434
return process.dlopen(module, path._makeLong(filename));
^

Error: Module version mismatch. Expected 46, got 48.
at Error (native)
at Object.Module._extensions..node (module.js:434:18)
at Module.load (module.js:343:32)
at Function.Module._load (module.js:300:12)
at Module.require (module.js:353:17)
at require (internal/module.js:12:17)
at Object.<anonymous> (/home/joe/atom-editor-beta/src/atom-1.15.0-beta0/apm/node_modules/atom-package-manager/node_modules/git-utils/lib/git.js:8:16)
at Object.<anonymous> (/home/joe/atom-editor-beta/src/atom-1.15.0-beta0/apm/node_modules/atom-package-manager/node_modules/git-utils/lib/git.js:371:4)
at Module._compile (module.js:409:26)
at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:416:10)
child_process.js:506
throw err;
^

Error: Command failed: /home/joe/atom-editor-beta/src/atom-1.15.0-beta0/apm/node_modules/atom-package-manager/bin/apm --loglevel=error install
at checkExecSyncError (child_process.js:483:13)
at Object.execFileSync (child_process.js:503:13)
at module.exports (/home/joe/atom-editor-beta/src/atom-1.15.0-beta0/script/lib/install-atom-dependencies.js:15:16)
at Object.<anonymous> (/home/joe/atom-editor-beta/src/atom-1.15.0-beta0/script/bootstrap:28:1)
at Module._compile (module.js:570:32)
at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:579:10)
at Module.load (module.js:487:32)
at tryModuleLoad (module.js:446:12)
at Function.Module._load (module.js:438:3)
at Module.require (module.js:497:17)

might be something that needs to go to their github instead?

SanpoChew commented on 2016-12-12 01:20

installed and working, thanks a lot!

fusion809 commented on 2016-12-11 23:30

Oops sorry forgot to bump the checksums. 'tis fixed now.

SanpoChew commented on 2016-12-11 23:24

Getting this error as of two minutes ago:

==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
atom-1.13.0-beta8.tar.gz ... FAILED
atom-beta.desktop ... Passed
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

ronjouch commented on 2016-11-15 22:53

@fusion809 all good with 1.13.0.beta3.m0.92.2-1. I rest fully placated... for now :) . Thanks for the fixes.

ronjouch commented on 2016-11-15 18:04

@fusion809 I was helping Atom maintainers troubleshoot issue "Shelling out to collect environment variables is creating runaway 100% CPU processes on Linux" ( https://github.com/atom/atom/issues/13084 ). Problem is fixed in 1.13.0-beta3, but only partially with this AUR package, because it seems the environment variable export at https://github.com/atom/atom/blob/master/atom.sh#L18 is not present in our atom{-beta}.sh

1. Could you add this line to our script?

2. Also, could we use the upstream-maintained version of the script? If no, what's preventing us from doing so?

ronjouch commented on 2016-11-13 01:12

@fusion809 hey by the way, here are the upstream bugs about fixing the build under node 7.x: https://github.com/atom/apm/pull/637 , https://github.com/atom/apm/issues/636 . Will ping you when they're part of a beta release and it becomes possible to re-depend on arch nodejs rather than aur nodejs-lts-boron.

fusion809 commented on 2016-11-12 23:23

My apologies, 'tis fixed now.

All comments