Package Details: atom-editor-bin 1.19.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/atom-editor-bin.git (read-only)
Package Base: atom-editor-bin
Description: Atom is a hackable text editor for the 21st century built on Electron - Precompiled binary from official repository
Upstream URL: https://github.com/atom/atom
Keywords: atom editor
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: apm, atom, atom-editor, atom-editor-git, atom-editor-git-tagged, atom-notracking
Provides: apm, atom
Submitter: butangmucat
Maintainer: grawlinson (forivall)
Last Packager: grawlinson
Votes: 298
Popularity: 5.756097
First Submitted: 2014-05-29 04:06
Last Updated: 2017-08-18 06:45

Pinned Comments

grawlinson commented on 2016-08-02 00:18

1.9.0 is officially released and I've been using this for the past hour without any problems.

Having said that, feel free to blame me for any issues.

Latest Comments

grawlinson commented on 2017-08-09 05:30

@yitzi: Thanks! This python 2/3 thing is getting a bit ridiculous. Can't wait for 2020.

1.19.0 is up.

yitzi commented on 2017-08-08 20:28

There are two additional calls to python in /usr/share/atom/resources/app/apm/bin/python-interceptor.sh that probably needed to be changed to python2. node-gyp fails otherwise.

grawlinson commented on 2017-06-17 05:07

@heichblatt: Thanks! Been a bit under the weather lately, will merge your patch ASAP.

heichblatt commented on 2017-06-16 14:28

Hello,

the following patch brings us to 1.18.0.

---
diff --git a/PKGBUILD b/PKGBUILD
index ce7d04c..c4403ae 100644
--- a/PKGBUILD
+++ b/PKGBUILD
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
# Upstream URL: https://github.com/atom/atom

pkgname=atom-editor-bin
-pkgver=1.17.2
+pkgver=1.18.0
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="Atom is a hackable text editor for the 21st century built on Electron - Precompiled binary from official repository"
arch=('x86_64')
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ optdepends=('gvfs')
conflicts=('atom' 'atom-editor' 'atom-editor-git' 'atom-editor-git-tagged' 'apm' 'atom-notracking')
install=$pkgname.install

-md5sums=('b65beaae1b08bf60d80297a793662756'
+md5sums=('74098a72b38a82757ffdfe7b6a60eb28'
'22b4763c2e8607f0ea46311ec13da9ff'
'd472858970fc4ba6f63197729b65607c')
source=("atom-amd64-v${pkgver}.deb::https://atom-installer.github.com/v${pkgver}/atom-amd64.deb"
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ source=("atom-amd64-v${pkgver}.deb::https://atom-installer.github.com/v${pkgver}
startupwmclass.patch)

package() {
- bsdtar xf data.tar.gz
+ bsdtar xf data.tar.xz
printf "Applying atom-python.patch\n"
patch -p1 < "${srcdir}"/atom-python.patch
printf "Applying startupwmclass.patch\n"
---

Ok?

wamari commented on 2017-05-17 03:31

Trying to install but getting the error below

-> Downloading atom-amd64-v1.17.0.deb...
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
28 93.0M 28 26.6M 0 0 2072k 0 0:00:45 0:00:13 0:00:32 2426k
curl: (23) Failed writing body (3649 != 16384)
==> ERROR: Failure while downloading https://atom-installer.github.com/v1.17.0/atom-amd64.deb
Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build atom-editor-bin.

saildata commented on 2017-03-28 22:05

First, thank you for maintaining the package. Also, I wanted to note that the description should read either "Chromium based" or more accurately "Electron based", but definitely not Chrome.

forivall commented on 2016-12-21 23:30

@morion @jokeyrhyme However, the atom that is in community has some significant patches, and the upstream atom maintainers generally prefer bug reports from their official build of the package. So, imo, this should be kept.

morion commented on 2016-12-21 02:13

There is a Atom package in official repository
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/atom/

AMZ-X commented on 2016-11-23 16:15

Error: /usr/share/atom/atom: error while loading shared libraries: libXss.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Required dependency: libxss

Vrakfall commented on 2016-11-14 02:24

@forivall - My bad, I didn't check that wiki page, I should have. I'm actually using Manjaro-bspwm and didn't get all of those package installed with it.

All comments