Package Details: atom-editor-bin 1.9.9-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/atom-editor-bin.git (read-only)
Package Base: atom-editor-bin
Description: Chrome-based text editor from Github - Precompiled binary from official repository
Upstream URL: https://github.com/atom/atom
Keywords: atom editor
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: atom-editor, atom-editor-git, atom-editor-git-tagged
Submitter: butangmucat
Maintainer: despairblue (forivall, grawlinson)
Last Packager: grawlinson
Votes: 260
Popularity: 9.117603
First Submitted: 2014-05-29 04:06
Last Updated: 2016-08-19 10:55

Pinned Comments

grawlinson commented on 2016-08-02 00:18

1.9.0 is officially released and I've been using this for the past hour without any problems.

Having said that, feel free to blame me for any issues.

Latest Comments

tuxayo commented on 2016-08-12 14:31

As this binary includes Google Analytics which is proprietary, should the license of the package be kept to MIT?

grawlinson commented on 2016-08-07 04:49

Updated to 1.9.6.

Six point releases in five days. Wow, the Atom team are pretty busy! I'll be checking on this package more often.

grawlinson commented on 2016-08-02 00:18

1.9.0 is officially released and I've been using this for the past hour without any problems.

Having said that, feel free to blame me for any issues.

onestone commented on 2016-08-01 21:02

Atom 1.9 has been released, hopefully this package can now be resurrected.

despairblue commented on 2016-06-09 10:33

@all atom@1.9.0-beta0 updated electron which is compatible with the current freetype2 package. So the next update will be atom@1.9.0 as soon as github tags it as stable. If you want to try it now, I suggest using https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/atom-editor-beta-bin/ which I use on a day to day basis without any problems.

despairblue commented on 2016-05-29 13:15

@xavier83 just tried that, actually it's pretty easy, just change the source and remove the first line in the build function. It's still segfaulting though... :(

xavier83 commented on 2016-05-29 05:05

@despairblue What about @forivall's suggession to use fedora package instead?
It would be a lot of work, I guess?

despairblue commented on 2016-05-26 20:55

@hypnoglow: atom-editor-bin is old because the newer packages are incompatible with arch because they are linked against an old fontconfig version. It seems that 1.9 will be compatible with arch again and that is when the bin package will be updated again.

hypnoglow commented on 2016-05-26 08:20

So what about updating this package?

edh commented on 2016-05-05 11:44

Since this package has a -bin suffix it is okay to just fetch any binary package that is available. Especially because the debian package seems to be incompatible a switch to the .rpm is rational.

All comments