Anyone notice that some packages when build from Aur using aura detects systems as x86_64 instead of i686 throwing an error that lib32-* packages are missing?
Search Criteria
Package Details: aura 4.2.0-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/aura.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | aura |
| Description: | A package manager for Arch Linux and its AUR |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/fosskers/aura |
| Keywords: | AUR pacman rust |
| Licenses: | GPL-3.0-or-later |
| Conflicts: | aura-bin, aura-git, aura3-bin |
| Submitter: | fosskers |
| Maintainer: | fosskers |
| Last Packager: | fosskers |
| Votes: | 176 |
| Popularity: | 1.58 |
| First Submitted: | 2012-06-13 09:49 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2026-01-14 21:46 (UTC) |
Dependencies (13)
- curl (curl-gitAUR, curl-c-aresAUR)
- gcc-libs (gcc-libs-gitAUR, gcc-libs-fast-optimizedAUR, gccrs-libs-gitAUR, gcc-libs-snapshotAUR)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR, git-wd40AUR)
- glibc (glibc-gitAUR, glibc-git-native-pgoAUR, glibc-eacAUR)
- openssl (openssl-gitAUR, openssl-aegisAUR, openssl-staticAUR)
- cargo (rust-beta-binAUR, rustup-gitAUR, rust-gitAUR, rust, rustup) (make)
- bash-completion (bash-completion-gitAUR) (optional) – for bash completions
- bat (bat-cat-gitAUR) (optional) – more featureful file viewing
- fd (fd-gitAUR, fd-gitAUR) (optional) – faster filesystem traversal
- graphviz (optional) – dependency graph generation
- ripgrep (ripgrep-gitAUR) (optional) – faster log searches
- shellcheck (shellcheck-binAUR, shellcheck-gitAUR) (optional) – PKGBUILD scanning
- xdg-utils (busking-gitAUR, xdg-utils-slockAUR, mimiAUR, mimi-gitAUR, openerAUR, mimejs-gitAUR, xdg-utils-mimeoAUR, xdg-utils-gitAUR) (optional) – for xdg-open
Required by (6)
- anneal (optional)
- anneal-bin (optional)
- anneal-git (optional)
- aura-emerge
- dpw (optional)
- pacup-arch-git (optional)
Sources (1)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 .. 40 Next › Last »
flamusdiu commented on 2013-02-10 21:27 (UTC)
fosskers commented on 2013-02-06 22:06 (UTC)
That's a pacman error, not an aura one. Notice that all the packages actually built.
Regardless, I'll try them out myself and see what happens.
AdrianTM commented on 2013-02-06 21:29 (UTC)
For some reasons Aura fails to install bin32-openjdk6 on a 64bit Archlinux
aura >>= Building `bin32-firefox`...
aura >>= Building `bin32-openjdk6`...
aura >>= Building `google-chrome`...
loading packages...
error: failed to prepare transaction (package architecture is not valid)
:: package openjdk6-6.b27_1.12.1-1-i686 does not have a valid architecture
Raw shell command call failed.
Not sure if it's package fault or aura's, but I was able to install it with yaourt.
By the way, I don't think it should stop installing all the packages if one fails to install, that's a bug in my opinion.
fosskers commented on 2013-02-06 10:44 (UTC)
@9souldier: ghc seems to be in a state of transition. It's hit 7.6.2 in the [haskell] repo, but not in extra. For some reason though, some packages (like haskell-regex-base) in [community] are already asking for 7.6.2. Either add [haskell] to your pacman.conf, or just wait a few days and this should fix itself.
<deleted-account> commented on 2013-02-05 23:40 (UTC)
haskell-regex-base is broken in arch repos also:
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: haskell-regex-base: requires ghc=7.6.2-1
fosskers commented on 2013-02-03 21:07 (UTC)
Hey xangelux. Nothing seems out of the ordinary in the PKGBUILDs of those two packages. Try upgrading them once, then try again. Do they pop up again? If so, I'm puzzled.
xangelux commented on 2013-02-03 18:21 (UTC)
Hi again, I have a weird behaiviour, I have 2 packages installed (python2-ecore and python2-evas) and they are up to date but Aura tells me they need to be updated. Pacman says the versions installed are the correct ones but aura says different. What could be the problem? (I tested with yaourt and it says no problem)
fosskers commented on 2013-01-29 09:24 (UTC)
xangelux, thank you for letting me know. Yes, haskell-regex-pcre is _very_ necessary, so I've adopted that AUR package. I am wondering what the difference between it and the package `haskell-regex-pcre-builtin` in [haskell] is though...
xangelux commented on 2013-01-29 05:40 (UTC)
haskell-regex-pcre is orphaned, is this needed now?
fosskers commented on 2013-01-27 08:08 (UTC)
1.1.2.0
-------
- Bash parser completely rewritten.
- Bug fixes (thanks to the new parser)
Pinned Comments
fosskers commented on 2024-07-31 10:21 (UTC)
Aura 4 has been released. If instead you wish you keep using the Haskell-based v3 series, please install:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aura3-bin