For anyone else stupid like me, the solution for the validity check error was to delete the cache as explained below by @Volker_Weissmann, but your cache path will be different from "~/.cache/pacaur/auracle-git" if you are not using the "pacaur" package manager
Search Criteria
Package Details: auracle-git r420.f4cebb5-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/auracle-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | auracle-git |
Description: | A flexible client for the AUR |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/falconindy/auracle |
Keywords: | aur |
Licenses: | MIT |
Conflicts: | auracle |
Provides: | auracle |
Submitter: | Foxboron |
Maintainer: | artafinde (falconindy) |
Last Packager: | artafinde |
Votes: | 122 |
Popularity: | 0.054118 |
First Submitted: | 2017-07-02 16:40 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-11-19 22:40 (UTC) |
Dependencies (10)
- libcurl.so (curl-http3-ngtcp2AUR, curl-gitAUR, curl-c-aresAUR, curl, lib32-curl)
- libsystemd (systemd-chromiumos-libsAUR, systemd-libs-fmlAUR, systemd-libs-selinuxAUR, systemd-libs-gitAUR, systemd-libs)
- pacman (pacman-gitAUR)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
- meson (meson-gitAUR) (make)
- perl (perl-gitAUR) (make)
- systemd (systemd-chromiumosAUR, systemd-fmlAUR, systemd-selinuxAUR, systemd-gitAUR) (make)
- fakechroot (fakechroot-gitAUR) (check)
- gtest (googletest-gitAUR) (check)
- python (python37AUR, python311AUR, python310AUR) (check)
Required by (10)
- aarchup (requires auracle) (optional)
- aarchup-git (requires auracle) (optional)
- argon
- argon-git (requires auracle)
- cylon (optional)
- fmo
- pacaur (requires auracle)
- pacaur-git
- simpleaur-git (requires auracle) (optional)
- updatehint (requires auracle)
Sources (1)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 27 Next › Last »
haug1 commented on 2022-01-14 16:46 (UTC)
artafinde commented on 2022-01-13 15:53 (UTC)
There's a package build already which you can try out if you have issues from my repo.
Volker_Weissmann commented on 2022-01-13 15:12 (UTC)
Same problem as xiretza here. rm -rf ~/.cache/pacaur/auracle-git/ solved it
Awebb commented on 2022-01-13 12:53 (UTC)
Remember to delete the abseil patch manually, if you have configured your own src folder (for some reason).
kleim commented on 2022-01-10 09:25 (UTC)
xiretza is right. I use no AUR helper, only makepkg and got the same error. My "fix" was deleting auracle-git folder then clone it again. (Yes, I know I am lazy).
14mRh4X0r commented on 2022-01-06 11:53 (UTC) (edited on 2022-01-06 11:54 (UTC) by 14mRh4X0r)
xiretza is right. That is, if makepkg downloaded the patch files previously, it won't try to redownload them if the URL changed (because how would it know?).
Considering they're patches, perhaps they should be included in the AUR repository itself?
xiretza commented on 2022-01-05 21:28 (UTC)
I know how to fix it. This isn't related to AUR helpers though, the same thing would happen with plain makepkg.
artafinde commented on 2022-01-05 19:59 (UTC)
@xiretza clear your aur helper cache.
xiretza commented on 2022-01-05 19:51 (UTC)
==> Making package: auracle-git r366.8739929-3 (2022-01-05T20:46:35 CET)
==> Retrieving sources...
-> Updating auracle git repo...
Fetching origin
-> Found abseil-fix.patch
-> Found static-fmt.patch
==> Validating source files with b2sums...
auracle ... Skipped
abseil-fix.patch ... FAILED
static-fmt.patch ... Passed
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
==> ERROR: Could not download sources.
When pulling remote sources, please version the file names accordingly so they are refetched by makepkg when required.
sekret commented on 2021-09-09 20:50 (UTC)
@artafinde, thanks, yes, I missed to update it locally. Sorry for the false alarm :-)
Pinned Comments
artafinde commented on 2022-01-26 09:15 (UTC) (edited on 2022-01-29 10:24 (UTC) by artafinde)
If the build fails:
SRCPKGDEST
directoryThere's a package build already which you can try out from my repo.
falconindy commented on 2020-05-31 15:35 (UTC)
FAQ:
PATH
handled by/etc/profile.d/perlbin.sh
makepkg -A
. The "any" architecture is reserved for packages with architecture independent files (and compiled C++ is not).