Package Details: avidemux-2.6 2.6.14-0

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: avidemux-2.6
Description: A graphical tool to edit video (filter/re-encode/split)
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL2
Conflicts: avidemux, avidemux-cli, avidemux-git, avidemux-gtk, avidemux-qt
Provides: avidemux-2.6=2.6.14
Submitter: ksj
Maintainer: shaggytwodope
Last Packager: shaggytwodope
Votes: 32
Popularity: 0.558299
First Submitted: 2013-07-14 20:04
Last Updated: 2016-09-17 17:40

Latest Comments

shaggytwodope commented on 2016-08-25 17:50

@TheChickenMan I thought the same when I adopted the package, However the rules for aur packages are pretty clear. In this case can't conflict with the name for the "official" version. So as far as I know gotta keep it named this way.

TheChickenMan commented on 2016-08-25 17:35

Shouldn't it be: Provides=("$_pkgname=$pkgver") ??

shaggytwodope commented on 2016-08-18 07:37

A new update came out around 2 hours ago. I've updated to that release. Removed any patches previously used. If anyone has any issues let me know and I'll fix it asap.

onestone commented on 2016-08-02 11:46

Latest update builds and works fine. Many thanks @VaguelyUseful and @shaggytwodope!

shaggytwodope commented on 2016-08-02 07:49

@VaguelyUseful Thank you, I've included the patch. Everything seems fine on my end. I'd love feedback if possible.

@onestone If you can, test the newest package and report if it's working for you.

VaguelyUseful commented on 2016-08-02 02:49

I've never created a patch before, so I have no idea what the proper way to do this is... but according to it has to do with glibc 2.23, and I've created a patch that works with this PKGBUILD on pastebin @

After it applies that patch, it compiles and the program actually runs. If I need to do something further, please let me know.

onestone commented on 2016-08-01 18:50

@shaggytwodope, yes - everything is up to date, and the build directory was clean. The only not-so-common thing about my system I can think about, is that gcc-multilib is installed instead of gcc. Could that be related? The errors indicate something wrong with the __cplusplus macro.

shaggytwodope commented on 2016-08-01 18:22

@onestone, Something is wrong that I can't spot. I've built this on 4 different machines and 2 vm's now with no error. Maybe someone else come across this. Is everything up to date? And the aur path clean before compiling?

onestone commented on 2016-08-01 17:55

@shaggytwodope unfortunately there are still build errors. Relevant part of the logs here:

shaggytwodope commented on 2016-08-01 10:10

The package has been updated with some patches to fix compile errors. I'm sorry for the delay. Hope it is working for everyone.

All comments