Package Details: avidemux-2.6 2.6.14-0

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: avidemux-2.6
Description: A graphical tool to edit video (filter/re-encode/split)
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL2
Conflicts: avidemux, avidemux-cli, avidemux-git, avidemux-gtk, avidemux-qt
Provides: avidemux-2.6=2.6.14
Submitter: ksj
Maintainer: shaggytwodope
Last Packager: shaggytwodope
Votes: 33
Popularity: 0.870413
First Submitted: 2013-07-14 20:04
Last Updated: 2016-09-17 17:40

Latest Comments

rvasilev commented on 2016-10-18 05:03

Build fails for qt5 for some unknown reason.

But Build for qt4 - succeeded with
bash bootStrap.bash --without-gtk --enable-qt4

shaggytwodope commented on 2016-10-06 11:52

@sant527 can you define "stuck". Understand that this can take considerable amount of time to compile. It's possible you need to permit it a bit more time to complete the process. Perhaps you can use some type of tool, htop for example to monitor cpu use. If it indeed does hang or crash, cpu use may drop. That aside, are any errors produced?

sant527 commented on 2016-10-06 11:03

-- Build files have been written to: /avidemux-2.6/src/avidemux_2.6.14/buildCore`

it got stuck up there

shaggytwodope commented on 2016-08-25 17:50

@TheChickenMan I thought the same when I adopted the package, However the rules for aur packages are pretty clear. In this case can't conflict with the name for the "official" version. So as far as I know gotta keep it named this way.

TheChickenMan commented on 2016-08-25 17:35

Shouldn't it be: Provides=("$_pkgname=$pkgver") ??

shaggytwodope commented on 2016-08-18 07:37

A new update came out around 2 hours ago. I've updated to that release. Removed any patches previously used. If anyone has any issues let me know and I'll fix it asap.

onestone commented on 2016-08-02 11:46

Latest update builds and works fine. Many thanks @VaguelyUseful and @shaggytwodope!

shaggytwodope commented on 2016-08-02 07:49

@VaguelyUseful Thank you, I've included the patch. Everything seems fine on my end. I'd love feedback if possible.

@onestone If you can, test the newest package and report if it's working for you.

VaguelyUseful commented on 2016-08-02 02:49

I've never created a patch before, so I have no idea what the proper way to do this is... but according to it has to do with glibc 2.23, and I've created a patch that works with this PKGBUILD on pastebin @

After it applies that patch, it compiles and the program actually runs. If I need to do something further, please let me know.

onestone commented on 2016-08-01 18:50

@shaggytwodope, yes - everything is up to date, and the build directory was clean. The only not-so-common thing about my system I can think about, is that gcc-multilib is installed instead of gcc. Could that be related? The errors indicate something wrong with the __cplusplus macro.

All comments