Package Details: aws-cli-bin 1:2.27.30-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/aws-cli-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: aws-cli-bin
Description: Unified command line interface for Amazon Web Services (Amazon provided v2 binary release)
Upstream URL: https://github.com/aws/aws-cli/tree/v2
Keywords: aws aws-cli aws-cli-bin aws-cli-v2 aws-cli-v2-bin
Licenses: Apache-2.0
Conflicts: aws-cli, aws-cli-git, aws-cli-v2, aws-cli-v2-bin
Provides: aws-cli
Submitter: nsyntych
Maintainer: nsyntych
Last Packager: nsyntych
Votes: 13
Popularity: 2.93
First Submitted: 2025-01-05 03:17 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-06-06 06:19 (UTC)

Dependencies (2)

Required by (17)

Sources (5)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

nsyntych commented on 2025-05-16 09:37 (UTC) (edited on 2025-05-16 09:38 (UTC) by nsyntych)

Actually putting the epoch back since if we remove it now it creates an upgrade loop. Other than creating an "ugly" version in the package I don't see any issue on keeping it now to avoid the loop.

nsyntych commented on 2025-05-16 08:33 (UTC)

The epoch was just stuck from an early version and forgot to remove it, it is going to be removed on next version now. This is version 2 as it is provided by Amazon as the default today, don't understand why version 1 is still being served by the official arch repo. Even if you visit the v1 CLI page explicitly it says "We recommend that you use AWS CLI version 2 instead", it looks like a deprecation message to me...

pkr commented on 2025-05-16 08:12 (UTC)

Can someone explain why epoch is used in PKGBUILD? According to https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD it should be used only if "absolutely required to do so". I would like to understand this. It confused me as I thought this is the version 1 of the aws-client. I think versioning should not be confusing.

nsyntych commented on 2025-04-27 16:40 (UTC)

@tmoore please run either 'pacman-key --refresh-keys' or 'gpg --refresh-keys' on your system, the key has been extended with the same signature.

tmoore commented on 2025-04-23 20:02 (UTC)

@nsyntych You need to update the proper PGP key from the link you mention in your PKGBUILD. It's expired now

pub rsa4096 2019-09-18 [SC] [expired: 2023-09-17] FB5DB77FD5C118B80511ADA8A6310ACC4672475C uid [ expired] AWS CLI Team aws-cli@amazon.com

nsyntych commented on 2025-04-22 23:09 (UTC) (edited on 2025-04-22 23:14 (UTC) by nsyntych)

Well... every other project I have come across in AUR and in the main arch repos uses 'Apache' instead of 'Apache-2.0' and that is what I replicated here.

If the point though is to use the SPDX license identifiers, I agree that 'Apache-2.0' is the correct one and I will change it.

I am curious to see every package complying though from now on, we have a looong way.

cg505 commented on 2025-04-22 17:50 (UTC)

I think the license string should be 'Apache-2.0', not 'Apache'

nsyntych commented on 2024-06-19 22:28 (UTC)

my bad, should be ok now.