Package Details: bacula-fd 15.0.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/bacula.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: bacula
Description: Bacula - A Network Backup Tool (file daemon)
Upstream URL: https://www.bacula.org
Licenses: AGPL3
Submitter: None
Maintainer: lifespirit
Last Packager: lifespirit
Votes: 35
Popularity: 0.94
First Submitted: 2014-04-25 13:59 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-05-20 07:24 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last »

kisanth commented on 2016-03-04 15:18 (UTC)

Edit PKGBUILD Remove parentheses from install statements: install=("bacula.install") => install="bacula.install" Add parentheses to provides and replaces: provides="${pkgbase}-dir-mysql" => provides=("${pkgbase}-dir-mysql") replaces="${pkgbase}-dir-mysql" => replaces=("${pkgbase}-dir-mysql") Now it will work...

boscowitch commented on 2016-02-26 13:10 (UTC)

Though about testing it if it's worth deploying... unforunately it fails install right at the beginning no mather if I say yes or no to: Install only bacula-bat ? [Y/n] ==> ------------------------------- ==> ==> ERROR: install should not be an array ==> ERROR: install should not be an array ==> ERROR: install should not be an array ==> ERROR: install should not be an array ==> ERROR: install should not be an array ==> ERROR: install should not be an array ==> ERROR: provides should be an array ==> ERROR: replaces should be an array ==> ERROR: install should not be an array ==> ERROR: install should not be an array ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build bacula. Thats always the result...

morlix commented on 2015-11-20 07:51 (UTC)

The current PKGBUILD doesn't create the working directory if only bacula-common, bacula-console and bacula-fd will be installed.

CptnChristo commented on 2015-11-17 23:55 (UTC) (edited on 2015-11-18 01:39 (UTC) by CptnChristo)

With release of core package alsa-utils-1.1.0-1, there is a name conflict for /usr/bin/bat (i.e. the bacula administration tool). I'm passing along this info in case AUR packages must be modified to avoid conflicts with core packages.

maleckii commented on 2015-11-02 05:58 (UTC) (edited on 2015-11-02 06:00 (UTC) by maleckii)

Since I'm actively using this in production, I may as well maintain it. * Updated to 7.2.0 * /var/log/bacula is now created by the package * Hostname in config files is now generated at package install time * Removed tcp_wrappers support, since tcp_wrappers hasn't been in Arch for some time, and I'm not sure anyone is actually using it.

AlD commented on 2015-10-31 13:43 (UTC)

FYI, I'm disowning these packages as I moved on to Bareos.

georgnix commented on 2015-10-02 09:12 (UTC)

I tested disaster recovery with the new 7.2.0 version yesterday. It worked with some fiddling around. Just to document it here, there are some more or less minor glitches with the packaging: * /var/log/bacula is not created by the packages, this causes the start of the director to fail. * /etc/bacula/scripts is not readable for user postgres. Thus database scripts cannot be executed properly. I think it would it be OK to have /etc/bacula and children world readable as long as the config files are only readable by root (clear text passwords). * Generated config files are in the package, i.e. static. They should be generated at package installation to have unique passwords and proper hostname. If anybody wants to fix the PKGBUILD, go ahead. I probably won't find the time to do it myself.

georgnix commented on 2015-10-01 14:29 (UTC)

I created an updated PKGBUILD for bacula 7.2.0 with additional minor fixes. http://www.george-net.de/aur/bacula/PKGBUILD-bacula-7.2.0 Diff against the old PKGBUILD to see the changes.

lka commented on 2015-09-21 15:04 (UTC)

Installation successful, systemctl status bacula-fd successful loaded and running, but server (bacula-dir, 2nd maschine) can't connect to client (arch). Nmap shows tcp port 9102 st up, but servers bconsole (status client arch) says no. By the way all other systems (non-arch) work fine, so i think my configuration is ok. I don't know why there is no respone from bacula-fd.

xisberto commented on 2015-09-02 15:43 (UTC)

Anyone can successfully install bacula-fd? It depends on tcp_wrappers, but its upstream URL can not be reached.

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last »