Package Details: beautysh 6.2.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/beautysh.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: beautysh
Description: A Bash beautifier for the masses
Upstream URL: https://github.com/bemeurer/beautysh
Licenses: MIT
Submitter: the-k
Maintainer: the-k
Last Packager: the-k
Votes: 7
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2018-02-04 18:45 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2021-10-12 21:21 (UTC)

Latest Comments

eschwartz commented on 2018-02-05 22:13 (UTC)

FWIW the reason setuptools is a runtime dependency is because of https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Python_package_guidelines#setuptools

It uses a console_scripts generated wrapper in /usr/bin/ which means it uses setuptools in order to load the module and pass arguments along.

the-k commented on 2017-08-30 11:15 (UTC)

@wucke13: Fixed. @boosterdev: Are you sure that's the problem? Because there seems to be no explicit or implicit run time dependency on setuptools.

boosterdev commented on 2017-04-19 18:50 (UTC)

it requires setuptools not only for make if build in a clean chroot this program will not run

wucke13 commented on 2017-03-11 15:22 (UTC)

Regardless of installing the python2 version or this one, error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) /usr/bin/beautysh exists in both 'python-beautysh' and 'python2-beautysh' Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. appears. If I force the installation, pacman -R offers me both versions to uninstall. In summary, installing one of the two makes pacman think both are installed, which results in the conflict of identical named files from diffrent packages. Any idea how to fix this?

the-k commented on 2017-01-09 10:33 (UTC)

Thank you, @B4SH-B00STER. Fixed now.

B4SH-B00STER commented on 2017-01-09 00:14 (UTC) (edited on 2017-01-09 00:17 (UTC) by B4SH-B00STER)

package_python2-beautysh should be python2 setup.py install https://github.com/B4SHB00ST3R/PKGBUILD/blob/master/stable/python-beautysh/PKGBUILD