Package Details: bin32-firefox 46.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/bin32-firefox.git (read-only)
Package Base: bin32-firefox
Description: Firefox 32bit for Arch 64 bit (en-US)
Upstream URL: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox
Licenses: GPL, MPL, LGPL
Submitter: c0nd0r
Maintainer: swiftgeek (nickoe)
Last Packager: swiftgeek
Votes: 57
Popularity: 0.004124
First Submitted: 2011-12-24 19:07
Last Updated: 2016-04-26 10:46

Dependencies (13)

Required by (1)

Sources (4)

Latest Comments

vnoel commented on 2015-10-22 07:20

Not sure we can really do something about it, but firefox bin32 always tries to load plugins in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins (on top of the ones in lib32) which creates many problems when there is for example several java plugins… (bin32 and normal) the 64 bits ones kind of take the precedence for whatever reason…

The only way I found to make java work on firefox 32 bits was to temporarily rename /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins…

Is there anything we can do to improve this situation?

swiftgeek commented on 2015-08-07 17:58

EMERGENCY BUMP: https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2015/08/06/firefox-exploit-found-in-the-wild/

swiftgeek commented on 2015-07-09 04:20

Yoink, bump

swdunlop commented on 2015-01-05 21:29

Still works; just have to bump the pkgver and rename the build hook to package to comply with makepkg changes. See https://gist.github.com/swdunlop/eab5f7890c5373bd4874 for an updated PKGBUILD.

c0nd0r commented on 2012-11-05 23:26

I don't have an internet connection available for the moment. I'll be back in two weeks and I'll update the package then. Sorry for the inconveniences.

foutrelis commented on 2011-12-24 19:59

Please use https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55262

Det commented on 2011-12-22 19:29

You request this in the AML: http://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general

Just send a mail to: aur-general@archlinux.org

It'd probably help to check out other people's remove/orphan/rename requests from this month: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-December/thread.html

c0nd0r commented on 2011-12-20 14:08

I don't know, should it? How do you rename the package?

techlive commented on 2011-12-20 04:44

Should this package be renamed to bin32-firefox?

Anonymous comment on 2010-10-10 10:59

this package is broken for me, because it can't even DOWNLOAD the dependencies...

No such file “orbit2-2.14.18-1-i686.pkg.tar.xz”.

==> ERROR: Failure while downloading orbit2-2.14.18-1-i686.pkg.tar.xz
Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build lib32-orbit2.
==> Restart building lib32-orbit2 ? [y/N]
==> -------------------------------------
==>
==> WARNING: Following packages have not been installed:
lib32-orbit2

==> WARNING: Dependencies have been installed before the failure
==> Restart building lib32-gconf ? [y/N]
==> ------------------------------------
==>
==> WARNING: Following packages have not been installed:
lib32-gconf

==> WARNING: Dependencies have been installed before the failure
==> Restart building firefox32 ? [y/N]
==> ----------------------------------
==>
==> WARNING: Following packages have not been installed:
firefox32

All comments