Package Details: bitcoin-core 23.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/bitcoin-core.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: bitcoin-core
Description: Bitcoin Core headless P2P node
Upstream URL: https://bitcoincore.org
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: bitcoin-cli, bitcoin-core-git, bitcoin-daemon, bitcoin-qt, bitcoin-tx
Provides: bitcoin-cli, bitcoin-daemon, bitcoin-tx
Submitter: atweiden
Maintainer: mrxx
Last Packager: mrxx
Votes: 11
Popularity: 0.039742
First Submitted: 2014-04-01 17:21 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2022-05-31 10:42 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

OxHaK commented on 2022-06-08 11:53 (UTC)

I need to remove the check() step in the PKGBUILD, else I get:

error: in "system_tests/run_command": check what.find(expected) != std::string::npos has failed

McGeezax commented on 2021-04-12 02:39 (UTC)

When I try to install the recent version of bitcoin-core on a fresh Arch install, it fails on the tests:

fatal error: in "arith_uint256_tests/basics": std::runtime_error: locale::facet::_S_create_c_locale name not valid

Assertion 'ret.second' failed

Does anybody know how to get past this error?

mrxx commented on 2021-02-16 14:34 (UTC) (edited on 2021-02-16 14:34 (UTC) by mrxx)

@nickj21 Installed 0.20, changed bitcoin.conf, updated to 0.21.

yonson commented on 2021-02-16 14:31 (UTC)

mrxx I must have been mistaken on how my settings were changed. How did you test this?

mrxx commented on 2021-02-16 12:36 (UTC)

nickj21, I've just tested this. /etc/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf was not overwritten by the update.

yonson commented on 2021-02-15 17:44 (UTC)

This package is a nice bundling of best practices (e.g. creation of bitcoin user), but I have made a few modifications to the system's bitcoin.conf. Is there a way to set these so they are not blown away on package updates?

mrxx commented on 2020-06-29 16:15 (UTC)

Thank you, sldfkjsldkfjsld. Checksums fixed.

sldfkjsldkfjsld commented on 2020-06-28 06:08 (UTC)

Your last commit changed the sha256 hashes of bitcoind-reindex.service and bitcoind.service to invalid values (the files didn't change at all).

mrxx commented on 2020-03-10 21:09 (UTC)

Removed nproc from make as proposed by trulex and pizzaman.

pizzaman commented on 2020-03-10 00:15 (UTC) (edited on 2020-03-10 00:20 (UTC) by pizzaman)

As @trulex mentioned nproc shouldn't be there, unless there are specific reasons to limit parallelism. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Makepkg#Parallel_compilation