Package Details: bitlbee-libpurple 3.6-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: bitlbee-libpurple
Description: Brings instant messaging (XMPP, MSN, Yahoo!, AIM, ICQ, Twitter) to IRC. libpurple enabled.
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL
Conflicts: bitlbee
Provides: bitlbee=3.6
Submitter: dequis
Maintainer: dequis
Last Packager: dequis
Votes: 17
Popularity: 0.000017
First Submitted: 2015-08-25 04:15
Last Updated: 2019-05-19 20:40

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

Strykar commented on 2020-08-10 04:57

Please add something like backup=('/etc/bitlbee/motd.txt') so the MOTD isn't overwritten on rebuild.

dequis commented on 2018-03-14 21:35

'any' is for packages that are architecture independent in their compiled state, and will generate -any packages. The recommendation here seems to be to include only architectures officialy supported by arch in the PKGBUILD.

What stops you from using "makepkg -A" to ignore the arch array?

ChrisLane commented on 2018-03-14 17:20

@dequis why not just set the supported architectures to 'any' or add aarch64? The source is compiled on the machine it's being installed on anyway. Quite a hinderance doing this manually myself.

Strykar commented on 2018-02-08 09:55

Thank you! One more Q, 'systemctl restart bitlbee' executes without error, but Bitlbee does not restart. Am I doing this right?

dequis commented on 2018-02-07 23:40

Just install purple-skypeweb-git

Strykar commented on 2018-02-07 23:12

Any chance this could support skypeweb instead of skyped/skype4py as suggested by Bitlbee devs? "The Skype API is deprecated and may have issues, such as losing messages You should use skypeweb instead." -

dequis commented on 2017-03-16 17:00

makepkg -A

ChrisLane commented on 2017-03-16 16:42

Could you please make this available for the 'aarch64' architecture?

dequis commented on 2016-03-29 05:58

I thought I had done it already but I misread and it was armv6h, which i see you requested before...

Also I googled for a bit and apparently you can use "makepkg -A" to avoid the need of waiting for package maintainers to update their stuff.

arnottcr commented on 2016-03-29 03:44

dequis: syn