Package Details: bitwarden_rs-vault 2.13.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/bitwarden_rs-vault.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: bitwarden_rs-vault
Description: Integrates the Vault Web-Interface into bitwarden_rs.
Upstream URL: https://github.com/bitwarden/web
Keywords: bitwarden manager password passwordmanager vault web
Licenses: AGPL3
Conflicts: bitwarden_rs-vault-bin, bitwarden_rs-vault-git
Submitter: mqs
Maintainer: mqs
Last Packager: mqs
Votes: 9
Popularity: 0.78
First Submitted: 2018-07-13 18:10
Last Updated: 2020-04-12 12:40

Pinned Comments

mqs commented on 2019-02-09 20:32

Please report bugs with this unofficial release (server AND apps/extensions) here or at https://github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs/issues/new?template=bug_report.md first. Please DO NOT file issues at official bitwarden channels except you know exactly what you're doing.

It can be quite bad for the maintainer (kspearrin) to spend some effort in trying to find your issue, only to find out that the issue is not his fault at all but lies in bitwarden_rs. See also https://github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs/issues/336

Latest Comments

1 2 3 Next › Last »

grawlinson commented on 2020-05-22 22:47

Apologies, I'll stop doing that. I'm just overexcited because this is such an awesome little bit of software! :D

mqs commented on 2020-05-22 12:58

@grawlinson As always, thank you for the notification, but I will update only if there is a bitwarden_rs version which (reliably) supports the new vault version[1] or if you can explain why it is important to update now. If you want cutting edge, please use the bitwarden_rs-vault-git package and give feedback if something is not working as intended. This package is supposed to be somewhat stable. Not "debian-stable" but "was tested by upstream"-stable.

I'm resetting the outdated-marker now.

[1] Specifically, I will update this package if the changelog of the bitwarden_rs release contains the magical line "Update web vault to version xy", which has not happened yet.

mqs commented on 2020-03-21 22:40

@grawlinson

I've just noticed the first URL in the pinned comment returns a 404, possibly due to it linking to dani-garcia/bitwarden, rather than dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs.

Whoops, fixed, thanks!

If stuff breaks, I file a bug report with upstream. Doesn't happen too often, thankfully!

I would usually agree with you but this here is a special case because it doesn't only have to be compatible with archlinux, but also with bitwarden_rs, which is not really tested until the release. So what I do is mostly wait for the "Update web vault to version xy" line in the bitwarden_rs release changelogs before uploading a new version here.

As this happened just now, here is your new version ;-)

grawlinson commented on 2020-03-14 10:04

No particular reason, I usually update my PKGBUILDs when upstream releases a new version. If stuff breaks, I file a bug report with upstream. Doesn't happen too often, thankfully!

I've just noticed the first URL in the pinned comment returns a 404, possibly due to it linking to dani-garcia/bitwarden, rather than dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs.

mqs commented on 2020-03-13 22:55

@grawlinson, thanks for notifying me, hadn't noticed that there was an update :)

I usually update this package after the other guys at bitwarden_rs got to test/try out the compatibility and stability, which usually results in a delay of ca. one month[1].

If there is interest, I can push the most recent versions (even to a different repository if necessary) but I don't want to risk stability for no reason. Is there a reason you want to have this update asap?

[1] Compare the dates of https://github.com/bitwarden/web/releases and https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/log/?h=bitwarden_rs-vault if you're interested ;)

mqs commented on 2020-02-21 21:38

Hey @grawlinson! If you mean the upstream URL of bitwarden_rs-vault-bin, then tbh I'm not sure myself. But as most of the original sources are from bitwarden/web and it is "more upstream" than dani-garcia/bw_web_builds, I chose that and put dani-garcia/bw_web_builds in the description. But if you can convince me, I'll change that in the next release.

If you mean this package (without the -bin) then bitwarden/web is the right "upstream". I'm the one responsible for the patchfiles even if they're mostly taken from dani-garcia/bw_web_builds and sources also refer to bitwarden/web. dani-garcia/bw_web_builds would be pretty much unrelated.

grawlinson commented on 2020-02-21 21:26

Hey mqs, thanks for providing the bitwarden_rs packages on the AUR! Much appreciated. :)

Shouldn't the upstream URL point at dani-garcia/bw_web_builds rather than the official bitwarden/web repository?

mqs commented on 2020-02-18 22:23

For everyone of you, who uses chrome and ran into the following bug:Copy Password Button not working, please --use firefox-- take a look at bitwarden_rs-vault-git or bitwarden_rs-vault-bin.

I added the latter one to the AUR just now and it follows the releases of https://github.com/dani-garcia/bw_web_builds. If you don't want nodejs anywhere near your system or hate how it litters in your home directory, you should definitely try it out.

(Note to self: I should probably test it myself before I promote it :> )

jokke commented on 2020-01-28 10:05

Yes, works now. Thank you! I build in a chroot with extra-x86_64-build of the package devtools. I can recommend using it for testing package builds. It only pulls in dependencies you define so you won't run into trouble because of a dependency that you have installed coincidentally. Also gives you useful output of unused runtime dependencies and such.

mqs commented on 2020-01-27 20:04

I think this was the same issue as with bitwarden_rs-vault-git: git was not in the makedeps array. It is now, please try again.

PS: I'm just guessing here, it builds successfully for me. If it still doesn't work, could you email me the whole output from makepkg or post a pastebin or something? What PC are you building this on? (x64/ARM, memory size, cpu, ?)