Package Details: blacktex 0.8.6-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/blacktex.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: blacktex
Description: LaTex code prettifier and formatter
Upstream URL: https://pypi.org/project/blacktex
Keywords: code-style LaTex
Licenses: custom:proprietary
Submitter: lmartinez-mirror
Maintainer: None
Last Packager: lmartinez-mirror
Votes: 0
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2021-03-20 01:23 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2022-07-07 05:50 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

lmartinez-mirror commented on 2022-03-30 16:22 (UTC)

NOTICE

The latest release contains obfuscated license-checking code. You may need a license to use this package.

carlosal1015 commented on 2022-03-21 16:32 (UTC)

No more development/source code in GitHub https://github.com/texworld/blacktex, now license is Other/Proprietary.

Latest Comments

lmartinez-mirror commented on 2022-03-30 16:26 (UTC) (edited on 2022-03-30 16:27 (UTC) by lmartinez-mirror)

@carlosal1015 Under normal circumstances, yes, this package would have to be renamed blacktex-bin. However, since upstream has revoked source access with no plans to reopen, I think this package can stay as is since we no longer have a tarball to compile from.

You only really need a -bin prefix if you're packaging a program that already has a package that builds from source. But we no longer have that.

lmartinez-mirror commented on 2022-03-30 16:22 (UTC)

NOTICE

The latest release contains obfuscated license-checking code. You may need a license to use this package.

carlosal1015 commented on 2022-03-30 16:17 (UTC)

The package must be called blacktex-bin, not blacktex. Example: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/paddlepaddle-bin

lmartinez-mirror commented on 2022-03-30 16:09 (UTC)

Upstream remembered to not publish source wheels with this release...

Looks like all releases starting with 0.8.3 will be wheel only.

carlosal1015 commented on 2022-03-23 18:40 (UTC) (edited on 2022-03-23 18:57 (UTC) by carlosal1015)

Nobody asked in the discord channel about this. Is like the behavior when someone noticed that other get profit of own work. Happily keeping only few ones like cplot as open source.

lmartinez-mirror commented on 2022-03-22 16:06 (UTC) (edited on 2022-03-22 16:07 (UTC) by lmartinez-mirror)

I've been noticing this across some of Nico's repos. Do you by chance know why they're taking down source code?

Thanks for the tip, will be pushing an update soon.

carlosal1015 commented on 2022-03-21 16:32 (UTC)

No more development/source code in GitHub https://github.com/texworld/blacktex, now license is Other/Proprietary.