Package Details: blivet-gui 2.4.1-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/blivet-gui.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: blivet-gui
Description: GUI tool for storage configuration
Upstream URL: https://github.com/storaged-project/blivet-gui
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: anatolik
Maintainer: None
Last Packager: truocolo
Votes: 8
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2014-09-06 16:58 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2023-12-24 15:41 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 Next › Last »

gnlrdrvo commented on 2024-08-21 06:13 (UTC)

Per ArchWiki, since make is part of base-devel, it should not be included in makedepends.

Ataraxy commented on 2024-05-22 21:16 (UTC)

When trying to run blivet-gui:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/blivet-gui", line 38, in <module>
    from blivetgui.dialogs.message_dialogs import ErrorDialog
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/blivetgui/dialogs/message_dialogs.py", line 31, in <module>
    from .helpers import adjust_scrolled_size
  File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/blivetgui/dialogs/helpers.py", line 34, in <module>
    from blivet import devicefactory
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'blivet'

FabioLolix commented on 2023-12-24 16:30 (UTC)

Send you both a patch by mail

Not sure about ruby though.

It build fine without ruby

  • git as makedepends not needed
  • packages of base-devel like make don't have to be specified in makedepends=()
  • removed unused variable
  • changed arch=() to any
Checking blivet-gui-2.4.1-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst
blivet-gui W: No ELF files and not an "any" package
  • Renamed source to be non-conflicting 
PKGBUILD (blivet-gui) W: Non-unique source name (2.4.1.tar.gz). Use a unique filename.

tallero commented on 2023-12-24 15:05 (UTC) (edited on 2023-12-24 15:40 (UTC) by tallero)

I would seriously complain is very much difficult to see what users are doing on this website.

If one of those 'total contributions' graphs was available you would notice an abrupt change in the amount, size and quality of contributions, followed by a very slow increase as of lately.

Last thing I was doing before last abrupt interruption was indeed to republish my work elsewhere so i could be more aware myself about the size of my contributions on here.

As I've said MarsSeed too, please send working code from git, not suggestions, if you think the fix is felt needed, so I can at least look at what you want to do.

That said, yes, it needs setuptools. Not sure about ruby though.

CyberShadow commented on 2023-12-24 10:45 (UTC)

Maybe check what happened to the maintainer,too.

I can see that you logged in and have been active recently. My conclusion was that you're no longer interested in maintaining the package, which is completely fine, but please just disown it in this case so that others may adopt it and continue maintaining it.

CyberShadow commented on 2023-12-24 10:42 (UTC)

I wrote my best attempt to explain what's wrong and include a fix on 2022-08-19 10:29 (UTC). Respectfully, you've had over a year to respond to that, even if it's a note with a request with a fully tested PKGBUILD. Please orphan the package if you're not interested in responding to feedback.

tallero commented on 2023-12-23 23:46 (UTC)

Hi cybernhadow. would have been nicer if you sent an updated pkgbuild instead of just writing that useless sorta-complaint which does not add nothing to the discussion.

Maybe check what happened to the maintainer,too.

CyberShadow commented on 2023-07-15 13:29 (UTC)

The setuptools problem still exists. Please disown the package if you are not going to fix it.

FabioLolix commented on 2023-06-18 10:09 (UTC)

rvm pkgbuild don't provides ruby and pkgbuilds want a ruby package

dalu commented on 2023-06-18 10:06 (UTC)

This wants to install system ruby, despite me having rvm

1 2 3 Next › Last »