Package Details: boost-build-nightly 20140102-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/boost-build-nightly.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: boost-build-nightly
Description: Boost build system, Nightly build
Upstream URL: http://www.boost.org/doc/tools/build/
Licenses: custom:boost
Conflicts: boost, boost-build
Submitter: ytj
Maintainer: None
Last Packager: marcs
Votes: 3
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2011-04-23 03:11 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2016-02-29 11:03 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 Next › Last »

timofonic commented on 2017-10-30 12:41 (UTC)

!  ~  pacaur --noconfirm --noedit -S boost-build-nightly :: Package boost-build-nightly not found in repositories, trying AUR... :: resolving dependencies... :: looking for inter-conflicts... :: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) :: astroid-git: requires boost !  ~ 

marcs commented on 2016-02-29 10:57 (UTC)

Hi snork, Makes no sense to remove those two files. If you want to use the boost official package versions of b2 or bjam, you should keep using the official package (boost). But makes sense to insert boost in the conflict array. Some time ago b2 and bjam were not present inside the boost official package. Thanks for noticing. M

v.prokopyev commented on 2016-02-21 09:15 (UTC)

Fixed file conflict with boost package on files `b2` and `bjam` by adding rm ${pkgdir}/usr/bin/b2 rm ${pkgdir}/usr/bin/bjam after /b2 install --prefix=${pkgdir}/usr

zoidberg_md commented on 2014-09-19 15:49 (UTC)

$ namcap boost-build-nightly/boost-build-nightly-20140102-1-any.pkg.tar.xz boost-build-nightly E: ELF file ('usr/share/boost-build/b2') outside of a valid path. boost-build-nightly E: ELF file ('usr/share/boost-build/b2') found in an 'any' package. boost-build-nightly E: ELF file ('usr/bin/b2-nightly') found in an 'any' package. Basically, the package can't be `any`, because it has architecture-dependent b2-nightly binary. I used the following patch. I think I missed the point completely. Is there another package I need in addition to this one so I can use boost-build? Is there any reason not to run ./b2 install? --- boost-build-nightly/PKGBUILD 2014-01-03 16:16:28.000000000 +0200 +++ boost-build-nightly.fixed/PKGBUILD 2014-09-19 18:43:28.451194034 +0300 @@ -5,10 +5,10 @@ pkgver=20140102 pkgrel=1 pkgdesc="Boost build system, Nightly build" -arch=('any') +arch=('i686' 'x86_64') url="http://www.boost.org/doc/tools/build/" license=('custom:boost') -depends=('lib32-glibc' 'python') +depends=('python') conflicts=('boost-build') source=("http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt") md5sums=('e4224ccaecb14d942c71d31bef20d78c') @@ -47,5 +47,7 @@ cd build sh bootstrap.sh - install -D -m755 b2 ${pkgdir}/usr/bin/b2-nightly + ./b2 install --prefix=${pkgdir}/usr + rm ${pkgdir}/usr/share/boost-build/b2 + rm ${pkgdir}/usr/bin/bjam }

ytj commented on 2014-01-14 05:00 (UTC)

I am the submitter and I am pretty sure that I did not add lib32-glibc and python in depends array. Actually the origin dependency should be "depends=('boost')" IIRC.

marcs commented on 2014-01-14 00:09 (UTC)

Strange, i don't have this problem, are you sure that is related to lib32-glibc ? I've adopted this package so for now i don't know for sure, but also namcap requires lib32-glibc as dependency. So for now i'm keeping it.

carneiro commented on 2014-01-13 23:38 (UTC)

Why does it depend on lib32-glibc ? I couldn't build because of that, and I simply removed it from the dependencies and it works like a charm.

marcs commented on 2014-01-05 01:32 (UTC)

Because it's a nightly build. Same concept that you are using for your packages based on git. Validation can go south every day.

schuay commented on 2014-01-04 10:05 (UTC)

Why are you downloading the source manually instead of simply using source=()?

matsic commented on 2012-05-29 14:58 (UTC)

user-config.jam contains line using qt : /Users/asydorchuk/Downloads/Qt ; it's boost-build bug i think. may be we should check that all non empty lines are comments in this file when install. Or may be just clear the file.

1 2 3 Next › Last »