Search Criteria
Package Details: boost-note-bin 0.23.1-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/boost-note-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | boost-note-bin |
| Description: | Boost Note.next, a replacement for Boostnote, an open source note-taking app for programmers. Official binary for the cloud space version. |
| Upstream URL: | https://boostnote.io/ |
| Licenses: | GPL3 |
| Conflicts: | boost-note |
| Submitter: | espenaf |
| Maintainer: | espenaf |
| Last Packager: | espenaf |
| Votes: | 3 |
| Popularity: | 0.000000 |
| First Submitted: | 2020-04-02 11:31 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2021-11-30 11:58 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
espenaf commented on 2021-08-11 12:28 (UTC)
The latest version has Local Space support removed, this is now added to a new version called Boost Note - Local. So if you need support for local spaces migrate to using boost-note-local-bin instead. New package can be found at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/boost-note-local-bin/.
espenaf commented on 2020-06-12 07:01 (UTC) (edited on 2020-06-12 07:01 (UTC) by espenaf)
I know that there does not exist any boost-note package yet, but my reasoning here was that if anybody makes an non -bin version of Boostnote.next, it would probably be called boost-note and this and that package should be in conflict, in the same way as boostnote-bin and boostnote is in conflict with each other.
camilo0365 commented on 2020-06-11 14:44 (UTC)
@espenaf Great work! I would suggest removing
boost-noteas a conflict because there isn't a package identified by it. The ones I am aware of are:But also worth considering if these are at conflict because Boostnote.next seems like a different enough piece of Software to not force a conflict. What do you think?
espenaf commented on 2020-04-28 12:30 (UTC)
Now it should be fixed properly.
<deleted-account> commented on 2020-04-28 06:35 (UTC)
==> ERROR: Integrity checks are missing for: source_x86_64
espenaf commented on 2020-04-27 08:08 (UTC)
Fixed checksum now.
gobonja commented on 2020-04-27 07:22 (UTC)
sha512sums needs to be updated. Getting: ==> Validating source_x86_64 files with sha512sums... boost-note-linux.deb ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!