Search Criteria
Package Details: boost-note-bin 0.23.1-2
Package Actions
- View PKGBUILD / View Changes
- Download snapshot
- Search wiki
- Flag package out-of-date
- 1 pending request
- Submit Request
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/boost-note-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | boost-note-bin |
| Description: | A document driven project management tool that maximizes remote DevOps team velocity. |
| Upstream URL: | https://boostnote.io/ |
| Keywords: | agile-development boostnote developer-tools devops documentation-tool electron hacktoberfest hacktoberfest2021 markdown notes-for-developer react typescript wiki |
| Licenses: | GPL-3.0-only |
| Conflicts: | boost-note |
| Provides: | boost-note |
| Submitter: | espenaf |
| Maintainer: | zxp19821005 |
| Last Packager: | zxp19821005 |
| Votes: | 3 |
| Popularity: | 0.000000 |
| First Submitted: | 2020-04-02 11:31 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-04-10 11:24 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- electron12-binAUR
- nodejs (nodejs-gitAUR, nodejs-lts-fermiumAUR, nodejs-sharedAUR, nodejs-lts-hydrogen, nodejs-lts-iron)
Latest Comments
espenaf commented on 2023-11-07 21:51 (UTC) (edited on 2023-11-07 21:53 (UTC) by espenaf)
@yochananmarqos: Sorry about that, the deletion request on boost-note-bin looked like you wanted to take over maintaining it, but reading it again makes me understand this was not the case. Anyway, I am not using this package myself anymore, so anyone interested can take over maintaining it.
yochananmarqos commented on 2023-11-07 20:49 (UTC)
@espenaf: Please do not add anyone as a Co-Maintainer without asking first.
espenaf commented on 2021-08-11 12:28 (UTC)
The latest version has Local Space support removed, this is now added to a new version called Boost Note - Local. So if you need support for local spaces migrate to using boost-note-local-bin instead. New package can be found at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/boost-note-local-bin/.
espenaf commented on 2020-06-12 07:01 (UTC) (edited on 2020-06-12 07:01 (UTC) by espenaf)
I know that there does not exist any boost-note package yet, but my reasoning here was that if anybody makes an non -bin version of Boostnote.next, it would probably be called boost-note and this and that package should be in conflict, in the same way as boostnote-bin and boostnote is in conflict with each other.
camilo0365 commented on 2020-06-11 14:44 (UTC)
@espenaf Great work! I would suggest removing
boost-noteas a conflict because there isn't a package identified by it. The ones I am aware of are:But also worth considering if these are at conflict because Boostnote.next seems like a different enough piece of Software to not force a conflict. What do you think?
espenaf commented on 2020-04-28 12:30 (UTC)
Now it should be fixed properly.
<deleted-account> commented on 2020-04-28 06:35 (UTC)
==> ERROR: Integrity checks are missing for: source_x86_64
espenaf commented on 2020-04-27 08:08 (UTC)
Fixed checksum now.
gobonja commented on 2020-04-27 07:22 (UTC)
sha512sums needs to be updated. Getting: ==> Validating source_x86_64 files with sha512sums... boost-note-linux.deb ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!