Search Criteria
Package Details: browserstack-local-x64 8.9-0
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/browserstack-local-x64.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | browserstack-local-x64 |
Description: | BrowserStack Local Testing binary - 64bit |
Upstream URL: | https://www.browserstack.com/local-testing/ |
Licenses: | Commercial |
Conflicts: | browserstack-local-x32 |
Submitter: | infabo |
Maintainer: | cjayross |
Last Packager: | cjayross |
Votes: | 2 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2020-05-18 08:33 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-07-25 17:37 (UTC) |
Dependencies (1)
- gcc-libs (gcc-libs-gitAUR, gccrs-libs-gitAUR, gcc11-libsAUR, gcc-libs-snapshotAUR)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2
<deleted-account> commented on 2022-02-06 22:24 (UTC)
@infabo Are you sure? I've just directly cloned and run
makepkg -i
and it's still failing. Thesha512sum
looks like it should be:infabo commented on 2022-02-01 18:09 (UTC)
Can't reproduce. Installs perfectly fine fresh from AUR.
<deleted-account> commented on 2022-01-31 23:25 (UTC)
FYI I'm seeing a failing validity check on 8.4-0.
infabo commented on 2022-01-31 08:27 (UTC)
I know this specific convention about suffixes. Since there is only a binary and no source-code or development-version (which may needs compiling) for BrowserStackLocal available, one does not need to use these suffixes. I know many AUR packages, that do not use a "-bin" suffix - even though the package clearly does not compile anything and just uses some prebuilt binary.
On the one with 32 or 64bit: yeah, I fully agree. I decided to use the "architecture" property of PKGBUILD for that. Maybe a decision on $CARCH may work as well. I did not want to fiddle with it, as I do not have any 32bit system around for testing that condition.
mephinet commented on 2021-09-15 15:06 (UTC)
Shouldn't this package be called browserstack-local-bin, and install either the 32 or 64bit version, depending on the machine?
gpoole commented on 2020-10-06 05:56 (UTC)
+1 to please update the sums, this is currently failing to install with "One or more files did not pass the validity check!"
efernandes commented on 2020-06-09 09:36 (UTC)
Hi!
Please update
sha512sum
field.Thanks!
« First ‹ Previous 1 2