Package Details: browsh 1.8.3-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/browsh.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: browsh
Description: A fully-modern text-based browser, rendering to TTY and browsers
Upstream URL: https://www.brow.sh
Licenses: LGPL2.1
Conflicts: browsh-bin, browsh-git
Submitter: MikuroK
Maintainer: gilcu3
Last Packager: gilcu3
Votes: 32
Popularity: 1.18
First Submitted: 2018-07-26 15:31 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-02-23 13:14 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 Next › Last »

gilcu3 commented on 2023-09-18 07:32 (UTC)

@mativiters I am not sure what the solution is here, because I cannot simply add firefox-nightly as dependency. I think the official way to do it would be to have the package firefox-nightly configured to provide firefox, but probably that wouldn't be desirable either.

mativiters commented on 2023-09-16 14:38 (UTC)

Possible to add firefox-nightly and firefox-nightly-bin to acceptable dependencies?

micwoj92 commented on 2022-09-29 22:57 (UTC)

Thanks, this looks much better.

gilcu3 commented on 2022-09-29 22:30 (UTC)

@micwoj92 You are right, it works with current go :) So, I uploaded a new version removing all the non-necessary stuff and fixing a bug I found in the process. Please let me know if anything else can be improved.

micwoj92 commented on 2022-09-29 22:10 (UTC)

No, this is not the way to do it. Did you even try? go is almost 100% backwards compatible.

gilcu3 commented on 2022-09-29 21:31 (UTC) (edited on 2022-09-29 21:33 (UTC) by gilcu3)

@micwoj92 Usually this is needed for go packages as they are almost never (in my experience) supporting the latest version of go. In this case browsh supports version 1.18 and current version in the arch repos is 1.19, which is potentially not compatible.

micwoj92 commented on 2022-09-29 15:40 (UTC)

Why are you downloading go?

gilcu3 commented on 2022-09-29 14:36 (UTC)

@Swivel package updated, please let me know if it works for everyone

Swivel commented on 2022-08-08 03:03 (UTC)

@Kab1r, can you please release this package so that someone else can pick it up please?

MikuroK commented on 2022-08-04 06:44 (UTC)

@Swivel i did decide to drop this package since the last upstream update, as it wasn't a trivial change, someone else picked it up soon after. Seems they might need some help building this as well...