Hi, are you able to add the prodID (0229) for MFC-295CN to the rules?
Should look like this:
ATTR{idProduct}=="0229", MODE="0664", GROUP="lp", SYMLINK+="scanner%n", ENV{libsane_matched}:="yes"
Search Criteria
Package Details: brscan3 0.2.13_1-6
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/brscan3.git (read-only) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | brscan3 |
| Description: | Brother SANE drivers for brscan3-compatible models |
| Upstream URL: | http://support.brother.com/g/s/id/linux/en |
| Licenses: | |
| Submitter: | deluminathor |
| Maintainer: | 12qu |
| Last Packager: | 12qu |
| Votes: | 61 |
| Popularity: | 0.156148 |
| First Submitted: | 2009-03-07 12:46 |
| Last Updated: | 2016-05-11 11:47 |
Dependencies (2)
Required by (3)
- brother-mfc-290c (requires brscan3) (optional)
- brother-mfc-5895cw (requires brscan3) (optional)
- brother-mfc7340 (requires brscan3) (optional)
Sources (4)
Latest Comments
grawlinson commented on 2017-03-09 03:09
12qu commented on 2016-08-22 11:19
@Ty4kO Sorry, unfortunately Brother does not provide ARM binaries, which the Raspberry Pi would need.
Ty4kO commented on 2016-08-22 05:50
Is it possible to install this package on Raspberry Pi 3?
12qu commented on 2016-05-11 11:47
@pigt Fixed, thanks
pigt commented on 2016-05-11 11:22
Thank you. @12qu
All is working!
note: Your .SRCINFO is not up-to-date. which will fail on some aur helper.
12qu commented on 2016-04-26 21:49
@pigt Done. Let me know if there are any issues.
pigt commented on 2016-04-16 08:08
Could you add Brother MFC-J220 to the udev rules.
ATTR{idProduct}=="0259", MODE="0664", GROUP="lp", SYMLINK+="scanner%n", ENV{libsane_matched}:="yes"
12qu commented on 2015-10-12 09:15
@rdoursenaud I've made the requested changes. Please let me know if you have any further issues.
rdoursenaud commented on 2015-08-15 11:04
Could you change the udev rules to
ATTR{idProduct}=="01eb", MODE="0664", GROUP="lp", SYMLINK+="scanner%n", ENV{libsane_matched}:="yes"
Changing the group from lp to scanner breaks printing on my MFC7320 since lpinfo don't see it anymore.
You should also add a priority in the naming like 50-brscan3.rules.
Thanks.
12qu commented on 2015-07-26 01:28
@diduwo I don't get this issue. By the looks of it your $pkgver is 0.2.11-5, so I suspect your PKGBUILD is out of date as the current $pkgver is 0.2.13-1.