Package Details: calculix 2.16-4

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/calculix.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: calculix
Description: CalculiX: 3D finite element solver and post-processor (executables)
Upstream URL: http://www.calculix.de/
Keywords: calculix finite-element
Licenses: GPL2
Submitter: None
Maintainer: mauritiusdadd
Last Packager: mauritiusdadd
Votes: 17
Popularity: 0.000074
First Submitted: 2007-11-24 13:59
Last Updated: 2020-05-23 21:11

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 ... Next › Last »

mauritiusdadd commented on 2020-05-22 19:11

@dkcampbell thank you very much! I'have been quite busy in the last couple of days. I'll merge your patch by the end of tomorrow, thanks again.

MMK66 commented on 2020-05-22 19:04

I have problem then compiling ccx (MKL)


sgetv0.f:404:32:

  367 |           call svout (logfil, 1, rnorm0, ndigit,
      |                                 2
......
  404 |          call svout (logfil, n, resid, ndigit,
      |                                1
Error: Rank mismatch between actual argument at (1) and actual argument at (2) (scalar and rank-1)
make[1]: *** [Makefile:50: sgetv0.o] Błąd 1
make[1]: Opuszczenie katalogu '/home/ProjektK66/ccx/src/x64/build/ARPACK/SRC'
ranlib /home/ProjektK66/ccx/src/x64/build/ARPACK/libarpack_MINGW64.a
...
gfortran -Wall -O2 -fopenmp -c allocation.f
allocation.f:1634:72:

 1634 |      &            "*NODE or *NODE PRINT or *NODE FILE or *NODE OUTPUT%")
      |                                                                        1
Error: Missing actual argument for argument '_formal_15' at (1)

Im add -fallow-argument-mismatch to Makefile ( https://paste.sr.ht/~dkc/2f2ab3b277dfff53a06cf9162eea067dea0b7988 )

dkcampbell commented on 2020-05-22 15:49

Hi @mauritiusdadd, the build issues @crataegus and myself are experiencing is caused by changes to the default options used by gcc, and gfortran with the release of gcc 10. For gfortran, a warning, by default is now an error, and for gcc, an ignored warning, became an error. Here's a link to a patch to fix the issue: https://paste.sr.ht/%7Edkc/2f2ab3b277dfff53a06cf9162eea067dea0b7988

I applied it on top of your patch. Feel free to merge this into your existing patch.

Thanks for your work maintaining this package!

mauritiusdadd commented on 2020-05-18 06:42

@crataegus and @dkcampbell thanks for reporting this, last time I have checked the package it was building correctly in a clean chroot. I will investigate on this asap.

dkcampbell commented on 2020-05-17 22:24

I'm getting the same build error as @crataegus. Are there any known workarounds?

blixawillbargeld commented on 2020-05-17 17:12

Just a quick question: does spooles work with multiple cores for you with this build?

crataegus commented on 2020-05-17 15:05

I'm getting an error when building the solver:

gfortran -Wall -O2  -c allocation.f
allocation.f:1634:72:

 1634 |      &            "*NODE or *NODE PRINT or *NODE FILE or *NODE OUTPUT%")
      |                                                                        1
Error: Missing actual argument for argument ‘_formal_15’ at (1)
make: *** [Makefile:11: allocation.o] Error 1
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
    Aborting...

I'm also getting a load of warnings, mostly about unused dummy arguments but I assume these are harmless.

mauritiusdadd commented on 2020-03-25 16:56

Hi @WholesomeDoktor, can you elaborate on the error (maybe post the full error message). To me it looks like the error message that makepkg gives when a dependency is missing: did you install all the required dependencies before building this package?

WholesomeDoktor commented on 2020-03-25 12:18

I am having build errors, ERROR: Could not resolve all dependencies. Do we edit the build files before installing? Like explained on the website.

Kunda commented on 2020-01-02 13:16

@mauritiusdadd Thanks! Happy New Year to you as well :)