Package Details: canon-pixma-mx920-complete 3.90.2.10-3

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/canon-pixma-mx920-complete.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: canon-pixma-mx920-complete
Description: Complete driver set (printing and scanning) for Canon Pixma MX920 series
Upstream URL: http://www.canon.co.uk/Support/Consumer_Products/product_ranges/printers/pixma/index.aspx
Licenses: custom
Submitter: mkoskar
Maintainer: mkoskar
Last Packager: mkoskar
Votes: 11
Popularity: 0.012336
First Submitted: 2014-03-29 23:43 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2023-12-05 19:01 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last »

rabarrett commented on 2014-09-06 00:02 (UTC)

I removed them all individually and then installed your package with pacman. It is now working by USB. Now I just need to get it running over ethernet. Thank you.

mkoskar commented on 2014-09-04 05:55 (UTC)

It seems you have installed it manually. You have to cleanup the filesystem before installing this package. Pacman rightly doesn't allow you install anything over already present files. Please see the man page of pacman, and other Arch resources regarding package management. One way is to check each conflicting files by '-Qo' and if they doesn't belong to any package remove it from filesystem ('rm'). Then retry installation.

rabarrett commented on 2014-09-03 23:27 (UTC)

Any update on this?

rabarrett commented on 2014-08-27 17:41 (UTC)

When I run pacman -Qo /usr/bin/scangearmp, it replies "error: No package owns /usr/bin/scangearmp" I don't remember installing it manually. Is there a way I can tell it to install this over the other files? I thought one of the whole ideas behind package management, like pacman, was that it was supposed to integrate these things gracefully. If it is already installed, it shouldn't complain, but just install what has not already been installed, right?

mkoskar commented on 2014-08-26 06:02 (UTC)

Did you install some other package providing those files? Or install manually? Run e.g., 'pacman -Qo /usr/bin/scangearmp'. If it returns some package uninstall it. If it doesn't then you probably install it manually somehow. Either way, it doesn't seem problem of the package. Files you are reporting to be conflicting are the very files provided by this package and should not be present on you system prior its installation.

rabarrett commented on 2014-08-26 03:51 (UTC)

Closer, but it doesn't work yet. Now it compiles all the files, but when it attempts to install them there are file conflicts. You can see a screen shot of the file conflicts here: http://postimg.org/image/60gkpoqib/

mkoskar commented on 2014-08-24 16:57 (UTC)

I see, I think you're right. I've got confused with the legacy part of this PKGBUILD. So now 'depends' is the same for both architectures. Please report if it works now. Thanks ;)

rabarrett commented on 2014-08-24 16:40 (UTC)

I'm running all 32 bit (because I don't have a 64 processor), so I shouldn't need that repo.

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last »