Package Details: catalyst-total-hd234k 13.1-36

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/catalyst-total-hd234k.git (read-only)
Package Base: catalyst-total-hd234k
Description: AMD/ATI legacy drivers. catalyst-dkms+ catalyst-utils + lib32-catalyst-utils
Upstream URL: http://www.amd.com
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: catalyst, catalyst-daemon, catalyst-dkms, catalyst-generator, catalyst-test, catalyst-utils, libcl, libgl, nvidia, nvidia-utils, xf86-video-ati, xf86-video-radeonhd
Provides: catalyst=13.1, catalyst-dkms=13.1, catalyst-libgl=13.1, catalyst-utils=13.1, dri, libatical=13.1, libcl, libgl, libtxc_dxtn, opencl-catalyst=13.1
Submitter: Vi0L0
Maintainer: Vi0L0
Last Packager: Vi0L0
Votes: 33
Popularity: 0.021666
First Submitted: 2012-06-12 16:59
Last Updated: 2016-06-12 18:50

Dependencies (22)

Required by (631)

Sources (32)

  • 3.5-do_mmap.patch
  • 4.2-fglrx-has_fpu.patch
  • 4.2-kolasa-fpu_save_init.patch
  • 4.2-ubuntu_buildfix_kernel_4.2-modified.patch
  • 4.3-gentoo-mtrr.patch
  • 4.3-kolasa-seq_printf.patch
  • 4.4-arch-block_signals.patch
  • 4.6-arch-get_user_pages-page_cache_release.patch
  • arch-fglrx-3.7.patch
  • arch-fglrx-acpi_handle.patch
  • arch-fglrx-authatieventsd_new.patch
  • ati-powermode.sh
  • atieventsd.service
  • atieventsd.sh
  • catalyst.conf
  • catalyst.sh
  • cold-fglrx-3.14-current_euid.patch
  • dkms.conf
  • fglrx_gpl_symbol.patch
  • foutrelis_3.10_fix_for_legacy.patch
  • gcc5-something_something_the_dark_side.patch
  • gentoo_linux-3.10-proc.diff
  • http://www2.ati.com/drivers/legacy/amd-driver-installer-catalyst-13.1-legacy-linux-x86.x86_64.zip
  • kolasa-3.19-get_cpu_var.patch
  • lano1106_fglrx_intel_iommu.patch
  • lano1106_kcl_agp_13_4.patch
  • lib32-catalyst.sh
  • makefile_compat.patch
  • makesh-dont-check-gcc-version.patch
  • makesh-src_file.patch
  • ubuntu_buildfix_kernel_4.0.patch
  • ubuntu_buildfix_kernel_4.1.patch

Latest Comments

Vi0L0 commented on 2016-07-25 17:57

I'm unable to perform actuall test as my card (290x) isn't supported by this driver.
I can only tell that fglrx module get compiled on 4.6.4-zen.

I can not guarantee that it will work with future release of zen kernel (neither the big one like 4.7, or smaller like 4.6.7), and that's why I would like to avoid such a dependency.

Megameneer commented on 2016-07-22 18:25

Does this package work with linux-zen? If so, could you add linux-zen to the list of possible dependencies?

Vi0L0 commented on 2016-07-08 15:04

I believe good knowledge of assembly language and a lot of time since amd libs are already compiled and we don't have access to the source code :)

My assembly knowledge is far from good, I won't be able to help you with this :(.
Also I'm not sure about the reward, at least not material one ;)
On the other hand there's a chance that many pregcn users of whole Linux community would thank you for this :)

hansbonini commented on 2016-07-07 02:53

what is necessary to patch to current xorg-server? maybe i can help you ;)

Vi0L0 commented on 2016-06-28 04:55

you have to use [xorg112] repo:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AMD_Catalyst#xorg112

hansbonini commented on 2016-06-28 00:50

Vi0l0, xorg-server<1.13.0 not found.

Vi0L0 commented on 2016-06-12 18:57

I added 4.6 kernel patch and switched to DKMS.
Can someone confirm if its working fine?
Don't have supported hw, can only tell that it's compiling well

Vi0L0 commented on 2016-06-08 21:23

I will work on 4.6 kernel support for hd234k on weekend - should be simple patch copy paste

Vi0L0 commented on 2016-01-20 10:25

13.1-33.2:
- kernel 4.4 support
- gcc5 support
- fixing lib32/dri symlink

There was one confirmation that it works fine on gcc5 so it's finally updated. also [catalyst-hd234k] was updated with these changes

Vi0L0 commented on 2016-01-04 20:16

13.1-32.1:
- just a little change that should fix 4.3 kernel support, gcc49 is still in dependencies list


more important, testing, updated driver is here:
http://catalyst.wirephire.com/tarball/0_LEGACY/testing/catalyst-total-hd234k-13.1-33.1.src.tar.gz
- it now has 4.4 kernel support - to do this I completely removed block_all_signals function as it was completely removed from the kernel, I just don't know what impact will it have, there's a little possibility that it won't work at all :).
Plus we still don't know if my previous testing update which removed gcc49 dep endency is working.

Is there a "daredevil" who can perform tests on this testing -33.1, at least on gcc5?

All comments