Package Details: checkstyle 10.4-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: checkstyle
Description: A tool to help programmers write Java code that adheres to a coding standard
Upstream URL:
Licenses: LGPL2.1
Submitter: aspirogrammer
Maintainer: MarcinWieczorek
Last Packager: MarcinWieczorek
Votes: 7
Popularity: 0.056575
First Submitted: 2016-05-02 05:42 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2022-11-21 12:54 (UTC)

Dependencies (3)

Required by (0)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

bertieb commented on 2023-10-09 13:39 (UTC)

For 10.4, if you make the change to checkstyle that @Ordoviz suggests (ie @$ → "$@") the sha256sum for the script changes.

Updated sha256sums:


The first one is unchanged, the second one is for the updated startup script:

$ sha256sum checkstyle
c7ce3120cbc1c5057feabf26b37d872e7799ebc3517c6b90be802f5a4da2e7a5  checkstyle

Ordoviz commented on 2022-12-04 13:37 (UTC)

Please put double quotes around $@ in the startup script. Otherwise we cannot use checkstyle on files containing spaces.

qdii commented on 2022-06-05 18:57 (UTC)

It looks like we are now at version 10.3. Any chance we could get an update for this package?

bageljr commented on 2021-10-18 21:54 (UTC) New version

ehs0329 commented on 2017-12-14 19:39 (UTC) (edited on 2017-12-14 19:45 (UTC) by ehs0329)

The md5sum failure seems to be caused, on my system at least, by pacaur keeping a cached copy of the download in ~/.cache/pacaur/checkstyle and checking that instead of the new copy. I'm not familiar enough with PKGBUILDS or pacaur to know if this is a failure of pacaur or the package itself, but the intermediate solution is to remove the ~/.cache/pacaur/checkstyle directory and try again (or, install checkstyle manually from a directory other than ~/.cache/pacaur/checkstyle).

aspirogrammer commented on 2017-12-06 19:45 (UTC)

Both the license and script issue should be solved now. However, I cannot reproduce the checksum issue.

tad commented on 2017-12-06 19:09 (UTC)

==> Validating source files with md5sums... download ... FAILED checkstyle ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

tata commented on 2017-12-05 22:23 (UTC) (edited on 2017-12-05 22:24 (UTC) by tata)

in line 26 you try to install a License without ensuring of the existence of the directory. Ether you should remove line 26 or ensure creating the dir. Thanks for updating the package

lpapp commented on 2017-10-04 14:38 (UTC)

bb010g is right, indeed. Any chance to fix that?