Search Criteria
Package Details: clips 6.4.1-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/clips.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | clips |
Description: | A forward-chaining rule-based programming language written in C that also provides procedural and object-oriented programming facilities. |
Upstream URL: | https://www.clipsrules.net/ |
Keywords: | Expert_Systems |
Licenses: | GPL |
Submitter: | None |
Maintainer: | morealaz |
Last Packager: | morealaz |
Votes: | 21 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2007-04-25 21:30 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-09-06 17:24 (UTC) |
Required by (1)
Sources (4)
- https://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/clipsrules/CLIPS/6.4.1/clips_core_source_641.tar.gz
- https://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/clipsrules/CLIPS/6.4.1/clips_documentation_641.tar.gz
- https://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/clipsrules/CLIPS/6.4.1/clips_examples_641.tar.gz
- https://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/clipsrules/CLIPS/6.4.1/clips_feature_tests_641.tar.gz
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
marioom commented on 2020-11-09 14:38 (UTC) (edited on 2020-11-09 14:38 (UTC) by marioom)
It seems that the version uploaded to their SourceForge repo isn't compiling correctly due to this error:
/usr/bin/ld: xmain.o:(.bss+0x40): multiple definition of `compose_status'; xclipstext.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
I tried to just remove
compose_status
fromxmain.c
, which seems unused. And that way it did compile and I can execute the binary without any apparent issues.Sandmann, can you include this patch? I've even updated the PKGBUILD for you. https://gist.github.com/marioortizmanero/40dc71067054bf8d49c5fd5144d31873
kalin commented on 2017-11-06 20:26 (UTC)
Sandmann commented on 2017-11-05 12:55 (UTC)
kalin commented on 2017-11-05 11:57 (UTC)
Sandmann commented on 2017-11-05 11:11 (UTC)
kalin commented on 2017-11-03 22:37 (UTC)
Sandmann commented on 2017-11-03 13:17 (UTC)
kalin commented on 2017-11-03 09:24 (UTC)
Sandmann commented on 2014-08-02 21:08 (UTC)
td123 commented on 2011-01-23 04:04 (UTC)
1 2 Next › Last »