Package Details: coreutils-selinux 9.5-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/coreutils-selinux.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: coreutils-selinux
Description: The basic file, shell and text manipulation utilities of the GNU operating system with SELinux support
Upstream URL: https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/
Keywords: selinux
Licenses: GPL-3.0-or-later, GFDL-1.3-or-later
Groups: selinux
Conflicts: coreutils, selinux-coreutils
Provides: coreutils, selinux-coreutils
Submitter: Siosm
Maintainer: IooNag
Last Packager: IooNag
Votes: 24
Popularity: 1.02
First Submitted: 2013-11-03 20:05 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-04-01 20:50 (UTC)

Required by (1381)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last »

xangelux commented on 2013-02-10 17:07 (UTC)

Should I just change the version to 8.20? or just change the PKGBUILD file for the kernel so it doesn't need this package but the default coreutils? If I change the version number only it tryes to patch with the old patches, are those related to selinux or I should only delete them?

Nicky726 commented on 2013-02-10 16:18 (UTC)

With version 8.20 it builds and installs fine. It also seems to work on on non-SELinux testmachine.

xangelux commented on 2013-02-10 06:48 (UTC)

Hi, I've come this far, now selinux-coreutils fails to install but not to build. It complains about conflicting files /bin/su, /etc/pam.d/su and /usr/share/man/man1/su.1.gz I have tested the install of selinux-pam with siosm's and it compiles and installs without problems but when I come to selinux-coreutils it fails to install, I will see if I can update the pkgbuild file to see if it's a version problem.

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-06-19 09:07 (UTC)

You're right. The problem isn't with the selinux support. Even the core package from ABS fails the test. Sorry for the trouble.

Nicky726 commented on 2012-06-18 12:45 (UTC)

Hi, I just build if without troubles. Does the test also fail if you build coreutils from abs?

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-06-17 15:23 (UTC)

One of the tests also fails for me: stty-pairs. The log for the test is full of lines like stty: standard input: unable to perform all requested operations and I always seem to get that error after stty commands including "parodd", however not all commands with "parodd" result in an error. Any idea why this happens? Or can I just safely ignore it? Thanks, gsx1022

Splith commented on 2012-04-10 00:52 (UTC)

I wouldn't think it's lack of RAM, server has 4GB RAM and 2GB swap, 1.5GB is used by services. The names of the test are 'cp-a-selinux' and 'many-dir-entries-vs-OOM' I don't know what many-dir-entries checks, but I think cp-a-selinux mounts a loop and tries to copy from it or whatnot?

Nicky726 commented on 2012-04-08 15:30 (UTC)

Was it killed due to lack of RAM, or is it just the name of the test?

Splith commented on 2012-04-08 14:32 (UTC)

Not sure why but I always get problems when compiling this. Today with 8.16-2, 2 tests failed; FAIL: cp/cp-a-selinux (exit: 99) FAIL: rm/many-dir-entries-vs-OOM (exit: 1) And here's a bit of the text with the second failed test; + du -sh d du: fts_read failed: d: Cannot allocate memory + fail=1 + chmod -R 700 d ./rm/many-dir-entries-vs-OOM: line 35: 3092 Killed chmod -R 7$ + fail=1 + rm -rf d ./rm/many-dir-entries-vs-OOM: line 36: 3095 Killed rm -rf d + fail=1 Not really sure why either are failing if I'm honest.

chenxiaolong commented on 2011-12-13 17:40 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick update :)

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last »