On https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=coreutils-uutils#n77
# additional cleanup
rm $pkgdir/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/*
Why deleting ALL completions??
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/coreutils-uutils.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | coreutils-uutils |
Description: | (Experimental) Use uutils as system core utilities |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/uutils/coreutils |
Licenses: | MIT |
Conflicts: | b3sum, coreutils, sha3sum |
Provides: | b3sum, coreutils |
Submitter: | kj_sh604 |
Maintainer: | oech3 |
Last Packager: | oech3 |
Votes: | 11 |
Popularity: | 2.48 |
First Submitted: | 2024-06-29 21:27 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-09-11 16:16 (UTC) |
On https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=coreutils-uutils#n77
# additional cleanup
rm $pkgdir/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/*
Why deleting ALL completions??
Replies to recent comments/flags
@dtomvan @blackout:
thank you very much for flagging for 0.1.0
release. PKGBUILD
has been updated.
@oech3:
uu_stty crate
I'll look into this. This package was originally derived from the old coreutils-hybrid
so a re-write/clean-up of the PKGBUILD
is definitely due soon. I'll keep your suggestions in mind.
manpages
I do think manpages ship with the uutils-coreutils
package so I think you can just symlink the manpages in your coreutils-uutils-symlink
PKGBUILD (if you haven't already done so).
EDIT: formatting changes
0.1.0
is out. https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/releases/tag/0.1.0
@oech3 sorry, just caught up with your comments on this package build.
RE: usage of symlinks
I see that you've already made a coreutils-uutils-symlink
package build, which is great! I'll probably keep this package "as is" for now, since it also builds the manpages and necessary libraries like libstdbuf.so
, which ships with coreutils
on Arch.
I do think your PKGBUILD is a great alternative.
I'll also wait on the resolution of #1 and the issue you posted, #2 on the uutils-coreutils
GitLab and see how the official maintainers would like to move forward.
RE: variable naming and nix-busybox stty
Thanks for that heads-up on the var names. When I get the free time, I'll rename the variables in the PKGBUILD to be in-line with AUR best practices.
The GNU version of stty
, chcon
, and runcon
are already being built in this package. If nix-busybox
completes the selinux set including chcon
and runcon
, I'll consider moving over to using the nix-busybox
package for the missing utils instead.
Thanks @oech3
Pinned Comments
oech3 commented on 2025-09-08 09:52 (UTC) (edited on 2025-09-15 15:44 (UTC) by oech3)
/usr/local/bin
is safer than this.-git
and-selinux
.Building same binary avaiable from repo and symlink only pkg is not allowed at AUR. Don't believe that this is avaiable until officlal drop-in appear.